877
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Simulated sensitivity of secondary organic aerosol in the South Coast Air Basin of California to nitrogen oxides and other chemical parameters

, &
Pages 679-692 | Received 21 Aug 2017, Accepted 05 Feb 2018, Published online: 19 Mar 2018

Figures & data

Figure 1. Left: Domain-wide 24-h average (second model day) SOA concentrations as a function of NOx emissions scaling factors. Specified lumped SOA species C1–C5 represent newly added aromatic degradation products as described by Dawson et al. (Citation2016) (furanones, nitro-phenols, peroxy nitrates, epoxides, and peroxy-bicyclic rings, respectively). Other SOA encompasses all other SOA species from previous versions of CACM/MPMPO, including small amounts from monoaromatic species and all other VOCs. Bars on the right indicate base case 2008 and 2023 domain-wide 24-h average concentrations. Right: As in left but expressed as fraction of total domain-wide 24-h average SOA concentrations.

Figure 1. Left: Domain-wide 24-h average (second model day) SOA concentrations as a function of NOx emissions scaling factors. Specified lumped SOA species C1–C5 represent newly added aromatic degradation products as described by Dawson et al. (Citation2016) (furanones, nitro-phenols, peroxy nitrates, epoxides, and peroxy-bicyclic rings, respectively). Other SOA encompasses all other SOA species from previous versions of CACM/MPMPO, including small amounts from monoaromatic species and all other VOCs. Bars on the right indicate base case 2008 and 2023 domain-wide 24-h average concentrations. Right: As in left but expressed as fraction of total domain-wide 24-h average SOA concentrations.

Figure 2. 24-h average (second model day) SOA concentrations and relative species contribution as a function of NOx emissions scaling factors in the grid cell for Central Los Angeles (CELA). Notation as in .

Figure 2. 24-h average (second model day) SOA concentrations and relative species contribution as a function of NOx emissions scaling factors in the grid cell for Central Los Angeles (CELA). Notation as in Figure 1.

Figure 3. As in for the grid cell for Pomona (POMA).

Figure 3. As in Figure 2 for the grid cell for Pomona (POMA).

Figure 4. As in for the grid cell for Riverside (RIVR).

Figure 4. As in Figure 2 for the grid cell for Riverside (RIVR).

Figure 5. As in but for only the last hour of the simulated second day.

Figure 5. As in Figure 1 but for only the last hour of the simulated second day.

Figure 6. Comparison of changes in total daily emissions within the SoCAB between 2008 and 2023. Codes not defined elsewhere: CO (carbon monoxide), HCHO (formaldehyde), MEK (methyl ethyl ketone), KETO (higher ketones), BALD (benzaldehyde), PHEN (phenols), MGLY (methyl glyoxal), ALKL (short-chain alkanes), ALKM (medium-chain alkanes), ALKH (long-chain alkanes), ETHE (ethene), OLEL (short-chain alkenes), OLEH (long-chain alkenes), ISOP (isoprene), BIOL (low-SOA-yield monoterpenes), BIOH (high-SOA-yield monoterpenes), AROH (high-SOA-yield monoaromatics), AROL (low-SOA-yield monoaromatics), MEOH (methanol), ALD2 (higher aldehydes), SO2 (sulfur dioxide), SO3 (sulfur trioxide), HONO (nitrous acid), MCR (methacrolein), and ACID (carboxylic acids).

Figure 6. Comparison of changes in total daily emissions within the SoCAB between 2008 and 2023. Codes not defined elsewhere: CO (carbon monoxide), HCHO (formaldehyde), MEK (methyl ethyl ketone), KETO (higher ketones), BALD (benzaldehyde), PHEN (phenols), MGLY (methyl glyoxal), ALKL (short-chain alkanes), ALKM (medium-chain alkanes), ALKH (long-chain alkanes), ETHE (ethene), OLEL (short-chain alkenes), OLEH (long-chain alkenes), ISOP (isoprene), BIOL (low-SOA-yield monoterpenes), BIOH (high-SOA-yield monoterpenes), AROH (high-SOA-yield monoaromatics), AROL (low-SOA-yield monoaromatics), MEOH (methanol), ALD2 (higher aldehydes), SO2 (sulfur dioxide), SO3 (sulfur trioxide), HONO (nitrous acid), MCR (methacrolein), and ACID (carboxylic acids).

Figure 7. Relative contributions of various parameters (indicated by the shading) to overall sensitivity of SOA constituents and total SOA (listed along the x-axis) based on LHS output for conditions at 2:00 PM local time in CELA (Central Los Angeles). Only those sensitivities with an absolute value greater than 0.1 are shown.

Figure 7. Relative contributions of various parameters (indicated by the shading) to overall sensitivity of SOA constituents and total SOA (listed along the x-axis) based on LHS output for conditions at 2:00 PM local time in CELA (Central Los Angeles). Only those sensitivities with an absolute value greater than 0.1 are shown.

Figure 8. As in but for conditions at 6:00 AM local time in LGBH (Long Beach).

Figure 8. As in Figure 7 but for conditions at 6:00 AM local time in LGBH (Long Beach).

Figure 9. As in but for conditions at 12:00 AM local time in RIVR (Riverside).

Figure 9. As in Figure 7 but for conditions at 12:00 AM local time in RIVR (Riverside).
Supplemental material

UAST_1446507_supplemental_file.zip

Download Zip (664.2 KB)

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.