1,341
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Performance of nanofiber/microfiber hybrid air filter prepared by wet paper processing

, , , &
Pages 1149-1157 | Received 14 Feb 2019, Accepted 12 Jun 2019, Published online: 09 Jul 2019

Figures & data

Figure 1. Schematic of laboratory-scale paper production process based on the Japanese Industrial Standard JIS-P8222 (Citation2005).

Figure 1. Schematic of laboratory-scale paper production process based on the Japanese Industrial Standard JIS-P8222 (Citation2005).

Table 1. Nanofiber geometrical properties.

Figure 2. SEM micrograph of NF-a (30%)/MF composite filter.

Figure 2. SEM micrograph of NF-a (30%)/MF composite filter.

Figure 3. Experimental setup for measuring the pressure drop and penetration of the test filter (DMA: differential mobility analyzer, CPC: condensation particle counter, and MFC: mass flow controller).

Figure 3. Experimental setup for measuring the pressure drop and penetration of the test filter (DMA: differential mobility analyzer, CPC: condensation particle counter, and MFC: mass flow controller).

Figure 4. Pressure drops of the tests filters as a function of mixing fraction.

Figure 4. Pressure drops of the tests filters as a function of mixing fraction.

Table 2. Pressure drop and inhomogeneity factor of the mixed filter (α = 0.06, u = 0.053 m s−1).

Figure 5. Penetration of the nanofiber mixed filters, (a) NF-a and (b) NF-b, as a function of particle diameter. The inhomogeneity factor of the fiber packing (δ) was used to calculate the theoretical curves (solid lines).

Figure 5. Penetration of the nanofiber mixed filters, (a) NF-a and (b) NF-b, as a function of particle diameter. The inhomogeneity factor of the fiber packing (δ) was used to calculate the theoretical curves (solid lines).

Figure 6. Calculated quality factor of the NF/MF mixed filter as a function of NF diameter. Dispersion of fiber diameter, σ, and inhomogeneity of the fiber packing, δ, were set to 0 and 1, respectively.

Figure 6. Calculated quality factor of the NF/MF mixed filter as a function of NF diameter. Dispersion of fiber diameter, σ, and inhomogeneity of the fiber packing, δ, were set to 0 and 1, respectively.

Figure 7. Comparison of the experimental and theoretical quality factor values of the nanofiber mixed filters, (a) NF-a and (b) NF-b, as a function of particle diameter. The inhomogeneity factor of the fiber packing, δ, was set to 1 for the calculations.

Figure 7. Comparison of the experimental and theoretical quality factor values of the nanofiber mixed filters, (a) NF-a and (b) NF-b, as a function of particle diameter. The inhomogeneity factor of the fiber packing, δ, was set to 1 for the calculations.

Figure 8. Quality factor (Qf) of the NF/MF mixed filters plotted against inhomogeneity factor of the fiber packing (δ). The broken lines show the theoretical values of Qf.

Figure 8. Quality factor (Qf) of the NF/MF mixed filters plotted against inhomogeneity factor of the fiber packing (δ). The broken lines show the theoretical values of Qf.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.