641
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Depositional arrangement of non-spherical atmospheric particles on impaction plate of a multi-nozzle impactor

, &
Pages 1381-1392 | Received 19 Feb 2019, Accepted 14 Aug 2019, Published online: 20 Sep 2019

Figures & data

Figure 1. Schematic and dimensions of simulated single-nozzle impactor.

Figure 1. Schematic and dimensions of simulated single-nozzle impactor.

Figure 2. Validation of current simulation results with numerical and experimental results of (Kim et al. Citation2014) for PM1 and PM2.5 impactors.

Figure 2. Validation of current simulation results with numerical and experimental results of (Kim et al. Citation2014) for PM1 and PM2.5 impactors.

Figure 3. Schematic diagram and dimensions of (a) the simulated section of multi-nozzle impactor and (b) plus a cross section view of the simulated section.

Figure 3. Schematic diagram and dimensions of (a) the simulated section of multi-nozzle impactor and (b) plus a cross section view of the simulated section.

Figure 4. (a) A general and (b) a detailed schematic of experimental package.

Figure 4. (a) A general and (b) a detailed schematic of experimental package.

Figure 5. The image of impactor (a) inlet and nozzles and (b) impaction plate and outlet.

Figure 5. The image of impactor (a) inlet and nozzles and (b) impaction plate and outlet.

Figure 6. Results of (a) streamlines colored by velocity magnitude and (b) volume rendering colored by velocity magnitude.

Figure 6. Results of (a) streamlines colored by velocity magnitude and (b) volume rendering colored by velocity magnitude.

Figure 7. (a) Velocity vectors on impaction plate and (b) velocity magnitude contours on impaction plate.

Figure 7. (a) Velocity vectors on impaction plate and (b) velocity magnitude contours on impaction plate.

Figure 8. Collection efficiency curve for non-spherical particles with variable shape factors.

Figure 8. Collection efficiency curve for non-spherical particles with variable shape factors.

Figure 9. The location of the nozzle center and the boundaries of the simulated area of impaction plate.

Figure 9. The location of the nozzle center and the boundaries of the simulated area of impaction plate.

Figure 10. Position of deposited particles with different aerodynamic diameters and shape factors on impaction plate (a) Da = 2.5, S.F = 1; (b) Da = 5, S.F = 1; (c) Da = 2.5, S.F = 0.5; (d) Da = 5, S.F = 0.5; (e) Da = 2.5, S.F = 0.3; (f) Da = 5, S.F = 0.3.

Figure 10. Position of deposited particles with different aerodynamic diameters and shape factors on impaction plate (a) Da = 2.5, S.F = 1; (b) Da = 5, S.F = 1; (c) Da = 2.5, S.F = 0.5; (d) Da = 5, S.F = 0.5; (e) Da = 2.5, S.F = 0.3; (f) Da = 5, S.F = 0.3.

Figure 11. Comparison of the deposition location of particles with a diameter of 2.5 µm and 5 µm.

Figure 11. Comparison of the deposition location of particles with a diameter of 2.5 µm and 5 µm.

Figure 12. Correspondence of experimental sample and numerical simulation results for the location of defined stagnation points created between two adjacent jets and where the jets hit impaction plate.

Figure 12. Correspondence of experimental sample and numerical simulation results for the location of defined stagnation points created between two adjacent jets and where the jets hit impaction plate.

Figure 13. Comparison of the results of numerical simulations and experimental samples for the linear deposition between two adjacent jets and at the edge of impaction plate.

Figure 13. Comparison of the results of numerical simulations and experimental samples for the linear deposition between two adjacent jets and at the edge of impaction plate.

Figure 14. Correspondence between experimental sample and the velocity magnitude contour for the location of linear low-deposited areas surrounded by linear depositions.

Figure 14. Correspondence between experimental sample and the velocity magnitude contour for the location of linear low-deposited areas surrounded by linear depositions.

Figure 15. Comparison of numerical simulation results and the experimental samples for primary deposition and low-cumulative deposition between two jets.

Figure 15. Comparison of numerical simulation results and the experimental samples for primary deposition and low-cumulative deposition between two jets.

Figure 16. Magnified images of particles related to different areas of deposition. (a) Central area of primary deposition. (b) Low-cumulative deposition between adjacent jets. (c) Outer area of primary deposition. (d) Linear deposition between adjacent jets.

Figure 16. Magnified images of particles related to different areas of deposition. (a) Central area of primary deposition. (b) Low-cumulative deposition between adjacent jets. (c) Outer area of primary deposition. (d) Linear deposition between adjacent jets.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.