986
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Investigation of particle deposition on a micropatterned surface as an energy-efficient air cleaning technique in ventilation ducting systems

, , &
Pages 1210-1222 | Received 06 Feb 2020, Accepted 02 May 2020, Published online: 29 May 2020

Figures & data

Table 1. Comparison between HEPA filter and different heights of the patterned surface.

Figure 1. (a) Computational domain of semicircular patterned surfaces and mesh distribution. (b) Turbulence kinetic energy (J/kg) along the Y-axis.

Figure 1. (a) Computational domain of semicircular patterned surfaces and mesh distribution. (b) Turbulence kinetic energy (J/kg) along the Y-axis.

Figure 2. (a) Experimental setup and patterned surface for the semicircular height of (b) 2000 µm (p/e from left to right: 3, 4, 5, and 6) and (c) 500 µm (p/e from left to right: p/e = 3, 4, 5, 6, and 10).

Figure 2. (a) Experimental setup and patterned surface for the semicircular height of (b) 2000 µm (p/e from left to right: 3, 4, 5, and 6) and (c) 500 µm (p/e from left to right: p/e = 3, 4, 5, 6, and 10).

Figure 3. Comparison of nondimensional deposition velocity between experimental (black) and numerical simulation (red) at the semicircular height of 2000 μm for the particle size of (a) 2.5 µm and (b) 0.5 µm and semicircular height of 500 μm for the particle size of (c) 2.5 µm and (d) 0.5 µm.

Figure 3. Comparison of nondimensional deposition velocity between experimental (black) and numerical simulation (red) at the semicircular height of 2000 μm for the particle size of (a) 2.5 µm and (b) 0.5 µm and semicircular height of 500 μm for the particle size of (c) 2.5 µm and (d) 0.5 µm.

Figure 4. 0.5-µm particle trajectory at different time steps (p/e = 10): (a) 0.005 s; (b) 0.007 s; (c) 0.009 s; (d) 0.011 s; (e) 0.013 s; (f) 0.015 s.

Figure 4. 0.5-µm particle trajectory at different time steps (p/e = 10): (a) 0.005 s; (b) 0.007 s; (c) 0.009 s; (d) 0.011 s; (e) 0.013 s; (f) 0.015 s.

Figure 5. Comparison of enhancement ratio for different heights of semicircular patterns: (a) 2000 µm; (b) 1500 µm; (c) 800 µm; (d) 500 µm.

Figure 5. Comparison of enhancement ratio for different heights of semicircular patterns: (a) 2000 µm; (b) 1500 µm; (c) 800 µm; (d) 500 µm.

Figure 6. Comparison of efficiency index for different heights of semicircular patterns: (a) e = 2000 µm; (b) e = 1500 µm; (c) e = 800 µm; (d) e = 500 µm.

Figure 6. Comparison of efficiency index for different heights of semicircular patterns: (a) e = 2000 µm; (b) e = 1500 µm; (c) e = 800 µm; (d) e = 500 µm.
Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download MS Word (4.8 MB)

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.