1,472
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

A primary care lifestyle programme suitable for socioeconomically vulnerable groups – an observational study

, , , , , & show all
Pages 352-359 | Received 06 Sep 2016, Accepted 11 Oct 2016, Published online: 16 Dec 2016

Figures & data

Figure 1. Flow chart of the participants in the Pro-Health intervention programme. The present study refers to participants in the health promotive dialogue and one-year follow-up (grey colour).

Figure 1. Flow chart of the participants in the Pro-Health intervention programme. The present study refers to participants in the health promotive dialogue and one-year follow-up (grey colour).

Table 1. Distribution (%) of various vulnerability factors among all participants in the health promotion programme Pro-Health at baseline and at one-year follow-up. Hisingen population as comparison.

Table 2. Distribution of age and number of participants in the different age groups.

Table 3. Descriptive variables at baseline; body mass index (BMI), waist hip ratio (WHR), waist circumference, p-glucose, p-glucose ≥7, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, view of life present and future, smoking, physical activity, take away stress, alcohol, diet, take away stratified for socioeconomic factor, i.e. living situation, education, employment and ethnicity (n = 3687).

Table 4. Comparison of change from baseline to one-year follow-up between the different groups with 0, 1, 2 and ≥3 socioeconomic vulnerability factors. Logistic regression analysis; age and gender included in the analysis. Dichotomisation by undesired change + unchange; desired change. Reduction of risk factor/increase of health behaviour indicated as improvement.