Patients’ perspectives on the use of the Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale self-assessment version in primary care

Carl WikbergDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Section of Primary Health Care, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; ;Närhälsan Research and Development Primary Health Care, Region Västra Götaland, Sweden; Correspondence[email protected]

Agneta PetterssonDepartment of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm; ;Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment (SBU), Stockholm;

Jeanette WestmanCentre for Family Medicine, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden

Cecilia BjörkelundDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Section of Primary Health Care, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden;

Eva-Lisa PeterssonDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Section of Primary Health Care, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; ;Närhälsan Research and Development Primary Health Care, Region Västra Götaland, Sweden;

Patients’ perspectives on the use of the Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale self-assessment version in primary care

Table 1. Sample distribution in the MADRS-S patient focus group study.

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature

Patients’ perspectives on the use of the Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale self-assessment version in primary care

Figures & data

Table 1. Sample distribution in the MADRS-S patient focus group study.

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date