Figures & data
Figure 1. Map of experimental area. Locations of study tracks are marked with red lines. Contains data from the National Land Survey of Finland Topographic map series (raster) 10/2017.
![Figure 1. Map of experimental area. Locations of study tracks are marked with red lines. Contains data from the National Land Survey of Finland Topographic map series (raster) 10/2017.](/cms/asset/a66d34e1-e86d-452f-991c-96041c2380d9/sfor_a_1562567_f0001_oc.jpg)
Figure 3. Average profiles of cone penetration resistance (CI) on the study tracks. Averages between 0 and 20 cm were used in the modelling.
![Figure 3. Average profiles of cone penetration resistance (CI) on the study tracks. Averages between 0 and 20 cm were used in the modelling.](/cms/asset/bad53780-9250-4d2b-a3a5-2176b69ed139/sfor_a_1562567_f0003_oc.jpg)
Table 1. Soil characteristics at the study tracks.
Figure 4. Average rut depths in the study tracks (1–7) after machine passes. Pass 1 = harvester (mass 22,500 kg), 2 = forwarder passes with load (mass 30,000 kg).
![Figure 4. Average rut depths in the study tracks (1–7) after machine passes. Pass 1 = harvester (mass 22,500 kg), 2 = forwarder passes with load (mass 30,000 kg).](/cms/asset/b4242c27-0c8d-4a99-a55e-df49bddf17ce/sfor_a_1562567_f0004_oc.jpg)
Table 2. Pearson correlation coefficients between rut depths (after one harvester pass and three forwarder passes) and soil properties calculated as averages for the test tracks.
Table 3. Mixed-linear models predicting the logarithm of the average rut depth (ln (ytmi)) of measurements in a measurement line.
Figure 5. The influence of the cumulative overdriven mass and soil volumetric water content on the rut depth.
![Figure 5. The influence of the cumulative overdriven mass and soil volumetric water content on the rut depth.](/cms/asset/76f6ef76-2237-4b5c-8a7d-f78fb539abf0/sfor_a_1562567_f0005_oc.jpg)