Figures & data
Figure 1. Single fraction dose-response curves for the original [Citation10] and repeated carbon ion experiment at 99 keV/μm together with the reference curve for 15 MV photons [Citation9]. The curve of the present study shows an increased slope and a lower TD50-value. Error bars indicate the uncertainty (1 SE) of TD50.
![Figure 1. Single fraction dose-response curves for the original [Citation10] and repeated carbon ion experiment at 99 keV/μm together with the reference curve for 15 MV photons [Citation9]. The curve of the present study shows an increased slope and a lower TD50-value. Error bars indicate the uncertainty (1 SE) of TD50.](/cms/asset/1ca7a44c-ff53-42e6-a9ce-8f61e152ebc6/ionc_a_1250947_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2. Measured dependence of RBE on LET: Compared to our previous study [Citation10], a higher RBE was measured at 99 keV/μm including previous data [Citation10] the LET-dependence is well described by a linear regression line. At 99 keV/μm, the RBE prediction of LEM IV agrees well with the measured data, whereas LEM I shows large deviations. Towards very low LET values, LEM I agrees better than LEM IV. Vertical error bars represent 1 SE while horizontal error bars represent a ± 2 mm positioning uncertainty of the spinal cord within the SOBP.
![Figure 2. Measured dependence of RBE on LET: Compared to our previous study [Citation10], a higher RBE was measured at 99 keV/μm including previous data [Citation10] the LET-dependence is well described by a linear regression line. At 99 keV/μm, the RBE prediction of LEM IV agrees well with the measured data, whereas LEM I shows large deviations. Towards very low LET values, LEM I agrees better than LEM IV. Vertical error bars represent 1 SE while horizontal error bars represent a ± 2 mm positioning uncertainty of the spinal cord within the SOBP.](/cms/asset/53c59d50-89d6-4fcf-8095-aa94c5ce3a17/ionc_a_1250947_f0002_c.jpg)