6,229
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Psychiatry

Successfully treated patients with vortioxetine versus venlafaxine: a simplified cost-effectiveness analysis based on a head-to-head study in Asian patients with major depressive disorder

, , , , , & show all
Pages 875-882 | Received 29 Aug 2019, Accepted 23 Jan 2020, Published online: 13 Feb 2020

Figures & data

Table 1. Demographic and clinical sample characteristics.

Figure 1. Successfully treated patients (STPs) at week 8 by treatment group.

*p < .05. Treated patients; last observation carried forward. STP Mood and Tolerability: vortioxetine n = 61/211; venlafaxine, n = 45/226; STP Mood and Functioning: vortioxetine n = 59/211; venlafaxine, n = 53/226.

Abbreviations. MADRS, Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale; SDS, Sheehan Disability Scale; STP, Successfully treated patient; TEAE, Treatment-emergent adverse event; XR, Extended release.

Figure 1. Successfully treated patients (STPs) at week 8 by treatment group.*p < .05. Treated patients; last observation carried forward. STP Mood and Tolerability: vortioxetine n = 61/211; venlafaxine, n = 45/226; STP Mood and Functioning: vortioxetine n = 59/211; venlafaxine, n = 53/226.Abbreviations. MADRS, Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale; SDS, Sheehan Disability Scale; STP, Successfully treated patient; TEAE, Treatment-emergent adverse event; XR, Extended release.

Table 2. Summary of drug costs, treatment outcomes and base case results.

Table 3. Clinical sensitivity results.

Table 4. Region sensitivity results, brand and generic prices.

Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download PDF (5.6 KB)

Data availability

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article. The authors may be contacted for further data sharing.