Figures & data
Table 1. Attributes and levels used in the discrete-choice experiment.
Figure 1. Example of a Discrete-Choice Experiment Question. Hib: Haemophilus influenzae type b.
Note: Respondents were presented with either the French- or German-translated version of the survey instrument; the example included here is the original English version used for translation.
![Figure 1. Example of a Discrete-Choice Experiment Question. Hib: Haemophilus influenzae type b.Note: Respondents were presented with either the French- or German-translated version of the survey instrument; the example included here is the original English version used for translation.](/cms/asset/969c16fb-76a1-4d99-b973-f79a186e091c/icmo_a_2325550_f0001_c.jpg)
Table 2. Respondent experience and demographic characteristics and other questions.
Table 3. Random-parameters logit model odds ratios: full sample (N = 190).
Figure 2. Conditional relative importance of attributes: full sample (N = 190). Hib: Haemophilus influenzae type b; vs. = versus.
Note: Conditional relative attribute importance is the proportion of total utility gained by switching from the least-to the most-preferred levels of attributes, rescaled to sum to 100% across all attributes.
a With their respective associated preparation time and risk of errors.
![Figure 2. Conditional relative importance of attributes: full sample (N = 190). Hib: Haemophilus influenzae type b; vs. = versus.Note: Conditional relative attribute importance is the proportion of total utility gained by switching from the least-to the most-preferred levels of attributes, rescaled to sum to 100% across all attributes.a With their respective associated preparation time and risk of errors.](/cms/asset/a242e92e-0b3f-4e06-9fa6-a74a839e9435/icmo_a_2325550_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 3. Conditional relative importance of attributes: subgroup analyses. A. Type of healthcare provider B. Experience with vaccine in the past year. Hib, Haemophilus influenzae type b; vs., versus.
a With their respective associated preparation time and risk of errors.
![Figure 3. Conditional relative importance of attributes: subgroup analyses. A. Type of healthcare provider B. Experience with vaccine in the past year. Hib, Haemophilus influenzae type b; vs., versus.a With their respective associated preparation time and risk of errors.](/cms/asset/d38e43d7-bd65-4789-981b-ce75186c2562/icmo_a_2325550_f0003_c.jpg)
Table 4. Random-parameters logit model odds ratios, subgroup analysis: type of healthcare provider (N = 190).
Table 5. Random-parameters logit model odds ratios, subgroup analysis: experience with vaccine (N = 190).