500
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Detrimental effects of long sedentary bouts on the biomechanical response of cartilage to sliding

, , &
Pages 375-388 | Received 12 Jul 2019, Accepted 24 Sep 2019, Published online: 08 Jan 2020
 

ABSTRACT

Purpose/Aim: Epidemiological evidence suggests, contrary to popular mythos, that increased exercise/joint activity does not place articular cartilage at increased risk of disease, but instead promotes joint health. One explanation for this might be activity-induced cartilage rehydration; where joint articulation drives restoration of tissue hydration, thickness, and dependent tribomechanical outcomes (e.g., load support, stiffness, and lubricity) lost to joint loading. However, there have been no studies investigating how patterning of intermittent articulation influences the hydration and biomechanical functions of cartilage.

Materials and Methods: Here we leveraged the convergent stationary contact area (cSCA) testing configuration and its unique ability to drive tribological rehydration, to elucidate how intermittency of activity affects the biomechanical functions of bovine stifle cartilage under well-controlled sliding conditions that have been designed to model a typical “day” of human joint activity.

Results: For a fixed volume of “daily” activity (30 min) and sedentary time (60 min), breaking up intermittent activity into longer and less-frequent bouts (corresponding to longer continuous sedentary periods) resulted in the exposure of articular cartilage to markedly greater strains, losses of interstitial pressure, and friction coefficients.

Conclusions: These results demonstrated that the regularity of ex vivo activity regimens, specifically the duration of sedentary bouts, had a dominant effect on the biomechanical functions of articular cartilage. In more practical terms, the results suggest that brief but regular movement patterns (e.g., every hour) may be biomechanically preferred to long and infrequent movement patterns (e.g., a long walk after a sedentary day) when controlling for daily activity volume (e.g., 30 min).

Acknowledgments

The authors kindly acknowledge Drs. Kota Takahashi (University of Nebraska at Omaha) and Steven Stanhope (University of Delaware) for sharing access to their healthy patient gait kinematic database, and to Dr. Jill Higginson (University of Delaware) and Rosa Kolbeinsdottir, M.Sc. (University of Delaware) for their assistance in analyzing the gait data presented in the Supplemental Materials.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

The supplementary data for this article can be accessed here.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the NSF Biomaterials and Mechanobiology Program under award number BMMB-1635536 and the Delaware Space Grant Consortiums College and Fellowship Program under award number NASA NNX15AI19H. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NSF or NASA; Delaware Space Grant Consortium [NASA NNX15AI19H]; Division of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation [BMMB-1635536].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 1,908.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.