475
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research articles

Detection and vocalisations of three owl species (Strigiformes) in temperate rainforests of southern Chile

&
Pages 121-135 | Received 21 Apr 2017, Accepted 20 Oct 2017, Published online: 19 Nov 2017

Figures & data

Table 1. Model selection statistics based on Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC) for estimating probability of occurrence (Ψ) and detection (ρ) of three owl species in temperate rainforests of southern Chile. Site-specific covariates: linear distance of broadcasts points to urban population (dis), and vegetation or canopy cover (cov), as a proportion (%) of the sky covered by canopy in each broadcast points. Sampling-occasion covariates or time-varying covariates: median temperature (T°) and presence of nest of the target species near (< 100 m) the broadcast point (nest). Only the top five model sets are shown.

Figure 1. Annual detection patterns of the three owl species recorded in Cerro Ñielol Natural Monument, southern Chile (March 2009–February 2010).

Figure 1. Annual detection patterns of the three owl species recorded in Cerro Ñielol Natural Monument, southern Chile (March 2009–February 2010).

Figure 2. Spectrograms showing the vocalisations recorded from the three owl species. A, Austral pygmy owl contact pair call; B, austral pygmy owl territorial call; C, austral pygmy owl tick tiririck call; D, austral pygmy owl nestling call or trigigick call; E, austral pygmy owl courtship call; F, austral pygmy owl diuh diuh call; G, rufous-legged owl territorial call; H, rufous-legged owl female contact pair call; I, rufous-legged owl contact pair call; J, barn owl territorial call; K, barn owl twittering call.

Figure 2. Spectrograms showing the vocalisations recorded from the three owl species. A, Austral pygmy owl contact pair call; B, austral pygmy owl territorial call; C, austral pygmy owl tick tiririck call; D, austral pygmy owl nestling call or trigigick call; E, austral pygmy owl courtship call; F, austral pygmy owl diuh diuh call; G, rufous-legged owl territorial call; H, rufous-legged owl female contact pair call; I, rufous-legged owl contact pair call; J, barn owl territorial call; K, barn owl twittering call.

Figure 3. Annual variation in vocalisations in the three owl species in Cerro Ñielol Natural Monument, southern Chile (March 2009–February 2010). A, Austral pygmy owl; B, rufous-legged owl; C, barn owl.

Figure 3. Annual variation in vocalisations in the three owl species in Cerro Ñielol Natural Monument, southern Chile (March 2009–February 2010). A, Austral pygmy owl; B, rufous-legged owl; C, barn owl.

Table 2. Fine-structural measurements of the vocalisations of three owl species. The results are presented as mean ± SD.

Table 3. Frequency of responses (%) of austral pygmy owl, rufous-legged owl and barn owl to broadcasting of five owl species, in the Cerro Ñielol Natural Monument, southern Chile (March 2009–February 2010).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.