https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9123-3621
![Sample our Engineering & Technology journals, sign in here to start your access, latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5933/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Engineering-Tech.jpg"})
Abstract
The authors previously analysed a real-world solid waste management (SWM) system using the solid waste optimization life-cycle framework (SWOLF) to identify optimal SWM strategies that meet modelled objectives (e.g. cost, environmental impacts, landfill diversion). While mathematically optimal strategies can support SWM decision making, they may not be readily implementable because of unmodelled objectives (e.g. practical limitations, social preferences, political and management considerations). A mathematical programming technique extending SWOLF is used to systematically identify, for several scenarios, different ‘optimal’ SWM strategies that are maximally different from each other in terms of waste flows, while meeting modelled objectives and constraints. The performance with respect to unmodelled issues was analysed to demonstrate the flexibility in potential strategies. Practitioner feedback highlighted implementation challenges due to existing practices; however, insights gained from this exercise led to more plausible and acceptable strategies by incrementally modifying the initial SWM alternatives generated.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the National Science Foundation (CBET-1034059), the Environmental Research and Educational Foundation (EREF), and Wake County, North Carolina. Megan Jaunich was supported by the Lonnie C. Poole/Waste Industries Scholarship through EREF. We gratefully acknowledge the Solid Waste Division of Wake County, NC, for providing data, reviewing proposed solid waste management alternatives and facilitating the development of alternative plausible SWM strategies.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.