2,333
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Comparison of gas- and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry for trace analysis of anilines in groundwater

, , &
Pages 8465-8477 | Received 11 Aug 2021, Accepted 23 Sep 2021, Published online: 18 Oct 2021

Figures & data

Table 1. Method parameters for GC/MS-MS.

Table 2. Retention time, mass transitions and MS-MS-parameters for quantification of aniline and aniline derivatives with liquid chromatography (LC/MS-MS).

Table 3. Overview of aniline derivative concentrations.

Figure 1. GC/MS-MS chromatogram of the standard mixture of aniline derivatives (each native compound: 10 µg L−1), for acronyms see .

Figure 1. GC/MS-MS chromatogram of the standard mixture of aniline derivatives (each native compound: 10 µg L−1), for acronyms see .Table 1

Figure 2. LC/MS-MS chromatogram of the standard of mixture of aniline derivatives (each native compound: 10 µg L−1, deuterated compounds: 15 µg L−1), for acronyms see .

Figure 2. LC/MS-MS chromatogram of the standard of mixture of aniline derivatives (each native compound: 10 µg L−1, deuterated compounds: 15 µg L−1), for acronyms see .Table 2

Figure 3. GC/MS-MS chromatogram of groundwater sample A (above) and fortified tap water sample B (below).

Figure 3. GC/MS-MS chromatogram of groundwater sample A (above) and fortified tap water sample B (below).

Figure 4. LC/MS-MS chromatogram of groundwater sample A (above) and fortified tap water sample B (lower).

Figure 4. LC/MS-MS chromatogram of groundwater sample A (above) and fortified tap water sample B (lower).

Table 4. Calibration curve equations for LC/MS-MS, coefficients of determination (R2), limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ), and repeatability (relative standard deviation, RSD, n = 10) at fortification levels of 0.1 and 50 µg L−1.

Figure 5. Quantification results of methylated anilines – comparison of GC/MS, GC/MS-MS and LC/MS-MS (in-house, means and standard deviations) with the interlaboratory comparison results (robust means and expanded uncertainties U) on groundwater (sample A, above) and fortified water (sample B, below).

Figure 5. Quantification results of methylated anilines – comparison of GC/MS, GC/MS-MS and LC/MS-MS (in-house, means and standard deviations) with the interlaboratory comparison results (robust means and expanded uncertainties U) on groundwater (sample A, above) and fortified water (sample B, below).

Figure 6. Quantification results of chloroanilines – comparison of GC/MS, GC/MS-MS and LC/MS-MS (in-house, means and standard deviations) with the interlaboratory comparison results (robust means and expanded uncertainties U) on groundwater (sample A, above) and fortified water (sample B, below).

Figure 6. Quantification results of chloroanilines – comparison of GC/MS, GC/MS-MS and LC/MS-MS (in-house, means and standard deviations) with the interlaboratory comparison results (robust means and expanded uncertainties U) on groundwater (sample A, above) and fortified water (sample B, below).
Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download PDF (326.8 KB)