Figures & data
Table 1. Method parameters for GC/MS-MS.
Table 2. Retention time, mass transitions and MS-MS-parameters for quantification of aniline and aniline derivatives with liquid chromatography (LC/MS-MS).
Table 3. Overview of aniline derivative concentrations.
Figure 1. GC/MS-MS chromatogram of the standard mixture of aniline derivatives (each native compound: 10 µg L−1), for acronyms see .
![Figure 1. GC/MS-MS chromatogram of the standard mixture of aniline derivatives (each native compound: 10 µg L−1), for acronyms see .Table 1](/cms/asset/c408a0a3-31e6-4305-b3d7-80ce510fbb7b/geac_a_1987423_f0001_b.gif)
Figure 2. LC/MS-MS chromatogram of the standard of mixture of aniline derivatives (each native compound: 10 µg L−1, deuterated compounds: 15 µg L−1), for acronyms see .
![Figure 2. LC/MS-MS chromatogram of the standard of mixture of aniline derivatives (each native compound: 10 µg L−1, deuterated compounds: 15 µg L−1), for acronyms see .Table 2](/cms/asset/1b18840d-2476-47b2-87d1-8206ab496d34/geac_a_1987423_f0002_b.gif)
Figure 3. GC/MS-MS chromatogram of groundwater sample A (above) and fortified tap water sample B (below).
![Figure 3. GC/MS-MS chromatogram of groundwater sample A (above) and fortified tap water sample B (below).](/cms/asset/e2710de8-a853-4022-a507-c33bc53dd38d/geac_a_1987423_f0003_b.gif)
Figure 4. LC/MS-MS chromatogram of groundwater sample A (above) and fortified tap water sample B (lower).
![Figure 4. LC/MS-MS chromatogram of groundwater sample A (above) and fortified tap water sample B (lower).](/cms/asset/63a00397-3c60-48b3-95bc-e35152c9a461/geac_a_1987423_f0004_b.gif)
Table 4. Calibration curve equations for LC/MS-MS, coefficients of determination (R2), limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ), and repeatability (relative standard deviation, RSD, n = 10) at fortification levels of 0.1 and 50 µg L−1.
Figure 5. Quantification results of methylated anilines – comparison of GC/MS, GC/MS-MS and LC/MS-MS (in-house, means and standard deviations) with the interlaboratory comparison results (robust means and expanded uncertainties U) on groundwater (sample A, above) and fortified water (sample B, below).
![Figure 5. Quantification results of methylated anilines – comparison of GC/MS, GC/MS-MS and LC/MS-MS (in-house, means and standard deviations) with the interlaboratory comparison results (robust means and expanded uncertainties U) on groundwater (sample A, above) and fortified water (sample B, below).](/cms/asset/18d922d0-fc92-4c66-9308-b6e0b39a259d/geac_a_1987423_f0005_b.gif)
Figure 6. Quantification results of chloroanilines – comparison of GC/MS, GC/MS-MS and LC/MS-MS (in-house, means and standard deviations) with the interlaboratory comparison results (robust means and expanded uncertainties U) on groundwater (sample A, above) and fortified water (sample B, below).
![Figure 6. Quantification results of chloroanilines – comparison of GC/MS, GC/MS-MS and LC/MS-MS (in-house, means and standard deviations) with the interlaboratory comparison results (robust means and expanded uncertainties U) on groundwater (sample A, above) and fortified water (sample B, below).](/cms/asset/0f22204d-15e6-4cd8-b939-5b01cebe6eae/geac_a_1987423_f0006_b.gif)