Physicochemical, bacteriological and water quality index assessment of hand dug well (HDW) water suitability for drinking

ABSTRACT

Underground water were abstracted from HDWs to determine their suitability for drinking. Physical, chemical and bacteriological parameters were carried out following standard guidelines. Total coliform count was done using the membrane filtration method. Heavy metal was determined using an Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer (AAS BULK SCIENTIFIC MODEL 210 VGP). Samples were subjected to statistical and multivariate analysis. Results of physicochemical parameters show that they were all within the WHO standard for drinking. Cation concentrations follow the order: Na⁺ > Ca²⁺ > Mg²⁺ > K⁺, while anions are: HCO₃⁻ > SO₄^2-> Cl⁻> NO₃⁻ > PO₄^2-. As, Cd and Pb were not detected in the sampled water, but other heavy metals Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn and Zn were detected. They were, however, within the WHO’s recommended range. Based on E. coli analysed, all of the water samples were free from faecal contamination since none was discovered in the water samples. Based on the water quality index, only sample G hand-dug well is of poor quality (though it could be treated) for human consumption; all other samples are good for human consumption. Deductions from Pipers’ and the Durov diagram, as well as principal component analysis, revealed that there was little geological and human activity within the hand-dug wells. Based on the physicochemical, microbiological, heavy metal and water quality indexes, this study indicates that all of the water samples examined are free of pollution, but that continual monitoring of the hand-dug wells should be prioritised.

KEYWORDS:

• Underground water
• hand-dug well
• drinking
• heavy metals
• physicochemical
• water quality index

Acknowledgement

The authors acknowledge the authority of Ekiti State University, Nigeria, for providing platform for carrying out this study.

Compliance with Ethical Standard

This study is an original work conducted by the authors and has not been published anywhere neither is it under review.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Informed consent

All authors conducted and approved the final draft of this paper.