3,280
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Avian metapneumovirus infection of chicken and turkey tracheal organ cultures: comparison of virus–host interactions

, &
Pages 480-489 | Received 13 Apr 2015, Accepted 22 Jul 2015, Published online: 07 Dec 2015

Figures & data

Figure 1. Ciliary activity after aMPV infection. Mean ciliary activity of aMPV-infected (a) chicken (n = 5–35) and (b) turkey (n = 5–40) TOC compared to virus-free controls at indicated times. hpi = hours post infection. Error bars indicate standard deviation. All virus-free control TOC remained at 100% ciliary activity throughout. Asterisks indicate significant differences between controls and infected TOC per timepoint (P < 0.05 student's t-test). Experiments 2 and 3 as representative experiments for chicken and turkey TOC, respectively.

Figure 1. Ciliary activity after aMPV infection. Mean ciliary activity of aMPV-infected (a) chicken (n = 5–35) and (b) turkey (n = 5–40) TOC compared to virus-free controls at indicated times. hpi = hours post infection. Error bars indicate standard deviation. All virus-free control TOC remained at 100% ciliary activity throughout. Asterisks indicate significant differences between controls and infected TOC per timepoint (P < 0.05 student's t-test). Experiments 2 and 3 as representative experiments for chicken and turkey TOC, respectively.

Figure 2. H&E staining of histological sections. Histological staining with haematoxylin and eosin of (a)+(c)+(e) chicken and (b)+(d)+(f) turkey TOC at (a)+(b) 24 hpi, (c)+(d) 96 hpi. (e)+(f) 120 hpi. hpi = hours post infection. The pictures are representative for all three trials. Arrows: degenerated, disrupted epithelium with loss of cilia, and partially detached epithelial cell layer.

Figure 2. H&E staining of histological sections. Histological staining with haematoxylin and eosin of (a)+(c)+(e) chicken and (b)+(d)+(f) turkey TOC at (a)+(b) 24 hpi, (c)+(d) 96 hpi. (e)+(f) 120 hpi. hpi = hours post infection. The pictures are representative for all three trials. Arrows: degenerated, disrupted epithelium with loss of cilia, and partially detached epithelial cell layer.

Figure 3. Average number of apoptotic cells per tracheal organ culture after aMPV infection. (a) Mean number of apoptotic cells in aMPV-infected chicken TOC (Experiment 2 as a representative experiment). n = 5/timepoint/group. hpi = hours post infection. Error bars indicate standard deviation. Asterisks indicate significant differences between controls and infected TOC per timepoint (P < 0.05 student's t-Test). (b) Detection of apoptotic cells (TUNEL assay), arrow indicates an example of an apoptotic epithelial cell of an aMPV-infected chicken TOC.

Figure 3. Average number of apoptotic cells per tracheal organ culture after aMPV infection. (a) Mean number of apoptotic cells in aMPV-infected chicken TOC (Experiment 2 as a representative experiment). n = 5/timepoint/group. hpi = hours post infection. Error bars indicate standard deviation. Asterisks indicate significant differences between controls and infected TOC per timepoint (P < 0.05 student's t-Test). (b) Detection of apoptotic cells (TUNEL assay), arrow indicates an example of an apoptotic epithelial cell of an aMPV-infected chicken TOC.

Figure 4. Immunohistochemical staining of aMPV antigen in the epithelial layer of TOC. DAB staining for aMPV-positive epithelial cells in TOC of (a)+(c)+(e) chicken and (b)+(d)+(f) turkey at (a)+(b) 24 hpi (virus-free controls), (c)+(d) 48 hpi (e)+(f) 96 hpi. hpi = hours post infection. Brown staining indicates aMPV-positive cells. The sections are representative for all trials.

Figure 4. Immunohistochemical staining of aMPV antigen in the epithelial layer of TOC. DAB staining for aMPV-positive epithelial cells in TOC of (a)+(c)+(e) chicken and (b)+(d)+(f) turkey at (a)+(b) 24 hpi (virus-free controls), (c)+(d) 48 hpi (e)+(f) 96 hpi. hpi = hours post infection. Brown staining indicates aMPV-positive cells. The sections are representative for all trials.

Figure 5. Average number of aMPV-positive cells in the epithelial layer of TOC. Mean number of aMPV-antigen-positive cells in aMPV-infected chicken (Experiment 2) and turkey (Experiment 3) TOC. Three microscopic fields were counted per organ culture and the mean of five cultures was calculated. Error bars indicate standard deviation. Graphs are representative for all three trials. Asterisks indicate significant differences between aMPV-infected chicken and turkey TOC per timepoint (P < 0.05 student's t-Test).

Figure 5. Average number of aMPV-positive cells in the epithelial layer of TOC. Mean number of aMPV-antigen-positive cells in aMPV-infected chicken (Experiment 2) and turkey (Experiment 3) TOC. Three microscopic fields were counted per organ culture and the mean of five cultures was calculated. Error bars indicate standard deviation. Graphs are representative for all three trials. Asterisks indicate significant differences between aMPV-infected chicken and turkey TOC per timepoint (P < 0.05 student's t-Test).

Figure 6. IFN-α mRNA expression after aMPV infection. In (a) chicken (Experiment 2) and (b) turkey (Experiment 3) TOC. Results are shown as fold change in comparison to the virus-free controls. n = 5/timepoint. Error bars indicate standard deviation. Asterisks indicate significant differences between virus-free controls and infected TOC per timepoint (P < 0.05 student's t-Test). The experiments shown are representative for all experiments.

Figure 6. IFN-α mRNA expression after aMPV infection. In (a) chicken (Experiment 2) and (b) turkey (Experiment 3) TOC. Results are shown as fold change in comparison to the virus-free controls. n = 5/timepoint. Error bars indicate standard deviation. Asterisks indicate significant differences between virus-free controls and infected TOC per timepoint (P < 0.05 student's t-Test). The experiments shown are representative for all experiments.

Figure 7. iNOS mRNA expression after aMPV infection. In (a) chicken (Experiment 2) and (b) turkey (Experiment 3) TOC compared to the virus-free controls. Results are shown as fold change in comparison to the virus-free controls. n = 5. Error bars indicate standard deviation. Asterisks indicate significant differences between controls and infected TOC per timepoint (P < 0.05 student's t-Test).

Figure 7. iNOS mRNA expression after aMPV infection. In (a) chicken (Experiment 2) and (b) turkey (Experiment 3) TOC compared to the virus-free controls. Results are shown as fold change in comparison to the virus-free controls. n = 5. Error bars indicate standard deviation. Asterisks indicate significant differences between controls and infected TOC per timepoint (P < 0.05 student's t-Test).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.