1,990
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Unravelling fatty liver haemorrhagic syndrome: 2. Inflammation and pathophysiology

, &
Pages 131-143 | Received 27 Apr 2019, Accepted 12 Oct 2019, Published online: 05 Nov 2019

Figures & data

Table 1. Primer and probe sequences for qRT-PCR.

Table 2. Effect of oestrogen injections, and a single LPS injection on mortality, the incidence of FLHS, and liver haemorrhagic score of laying hensa.

Table 3. Changes in blood cell counts (WBC and RBC), heterophil (H) and lymphocyte (L) percentages and H/L ratios in control and treated laying hens.a,b

Figure 1. Plasma concentrations of fibrinogen, triglycerides (TG), and gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT) in treated and untreated hens. E2 = oestrogen-treated; LPS = LPS-treated; E2 & LPS= E2- and LPS-treated; control = data are pooled for all controls (not treated, corn-oil treated and PBS-treated hens). Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6).

Figure 1. Plasma concentrations of fibrinogen, triglycerides (TG), and gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT) in treated and untreated hens. E2 = oestrogen-treated; LPS = LPS-treated; E2 & LPS = E2- and LPS-treated; control = data are pooled for all controls (not treated, corn-oil treated and PBS-treated hens). Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6).

Figure 2. Histological sections (H&E stain) showing livers from control, LPS-treated, and E2- & LPS-treated hens. Image A (×200) shows normal portal triad from control hens (V = portal venule; AR = hepatic artery; BD = bile duct), with some hepatocyte fat infiltration (thin arrows). Image B (×200) shows inflammatory cell infiltration (thick arrow) in the periportal area surrounding portal triad. Images C and D (×400) show periportal inflammation in livers from E2-treated hens. Note moderate periportal inflammation (thick arrow) and fat infiltration (thin arrow). Images E and F (×400) show inflammation and haemorrhages in livers from LPS- & E2-treated hens. Note severe parenchymal and sinusoidal (S) fat (thin arrow), leukocyte (thick arrow), RBC (double-headed arrow) infiltration and sinusoidal dilation (lined area), congestion and telangiectasia.

Figure 2. Histological sections (H&E stain) showing livers from control, LPS-treated, and E2- & LPS-treated hens. Image A (×200) shows normal portal triad from control hens (V = portal venule; AR = hepatic artery; BD = bile duct), with some hepatocyte fat infiltration (thin arrows). Image B (×200) shows inflammatory cell infiltration (thick arrow) in the periportal area surrounding portal triad. Images C and D (×400) show periportal inflammation in livers from E2-treated hens. Note moderate periportal inflammation (thick arrow) and fat infiltration (thin arrow). Images E and F (×400) show inflammation and haemorrhages in livers from LPS- & E2-treated hens. Note severe parenchymal and sinusoidal (S) fat (thin arrow), leukocyte (thick arrow), RBC (double-headed arrow) infiltration and sinusoidal dilation (lined area), congestion and telangiectasia.

Figure 3. Cytokine mRNA expression profiles from real-time qRT-PCR analyses of hepatocytes of treated hens compared to baseline levels and controls at 3 h and 24 h post-treatments. E2 = oestrogen-treated; LPS = LPS-treated; E2 & LPS= E2- and LPS-treated. All Ct values were corrected using the housekeeping gene 28S, and time point 0 was used as the calibrator. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM fold change relative to control (data are pooled for all controls: not treated, corn-oil treated and PBS-treated birds). Error bars show SEM from triplicate samples (n = 16) from two separate qRT-PCR experiments (P < 0.01, unpaired t-test).

Figure 3. Cytokine mRNA expression profiles from real-time qRT-PCR analyses of hepatocytes of treated hens compared to baseline levels and controls at 3 h and 24 h post-treatments. E2 = oestrogen-treated; LPS = LPS-treated; E2 & LPS = E2- and LPS-treated. All Ct values were corrected using the housekeeping gene 28S, and time point 0 was used as the calibrator. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM fold change relative to control (data are pooled for all controls: not treated, corn-oil treated and PBS-treated birds). Error bars show SEM from triplicate samples (n = 16) from two separate qRT-PCR experiments (P < 0.01, unpaired t-test).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.