Figures & data
Table 1. Recent divergence time estimates for the divergence of acrobatids from other petauroids, and for the Acrobates–Distoechurus divergence, using molecular clock node-dating and total evidence tip-and-node dating.
Figure 1. Interpreted tooth and cusp homology for acrobatids. A, Lower molar Rm1. B, Lower dentition i1–2 p1–3 m1–4. Abbreviations: A, anterior; end, entoconid; hyd, hypoconid; L, lingual; med, metaconid; pad, paraconid; prd, protoconid. Modified from drawing by M. Woodburne in Archer (Citation1984). [81 mm width].
![Figure 1. Interpreted tooth and cusp homology for acrobatids. A, Lower molar Rm1. B, Lower dentition i1–2 p1–3 m1–4. Abbreviations: A, anterior; end, entoconid; hyd, hypoconid; L, lingual; med, metaconid; pad, paraconid; prd, protoconid. Modified from drawing by M. Woodburne in Archer (Citation1984). [81 mm width].](/cms/asset/d5b7a207-58c1-4373-aeba-94abba7a29cf/talc_a_2242439_f0001_b.jpg)
Table 2. p-values for Mann–Whitney U tests comparing m1 length for A. pygmaeus, A. magicus sp. nov., A. pettitorum sp. nov., D. pennatus, and D. georginae sp. nov.
Figure 2. A–C, Distoechurus jeanesorum sp. nov., QM F61140 holotype, Lm1. A, buccal view. B, C, occlusal stereopair. D–I, Distoechurus georginae sp. nov. D–F, QM F61145, Rm1. D, buccal view; E, F, occlusal stereopair. G–I, QM F61144 holotype, Rm1. G, buccal view; H, I, occlusal stereopair. Scale = 1 mm. [169 mm width].
![Figure 2. A–C, Distoechurus jeanesorum sp. nov., QM F61140 holotype, Lm1. A, buccal view. B, C, occlusal stereopair. D–I, Distoechurus georginae sp. nov. D–F, QM F61145, Rm1. D, buccal view; E, F, occlusal stereopair. G–I, QM F61144 holotype, Rm1. G, buccal view; H, I, occlusal stereopair. Scale = 1 mm. [169 mm width].](/cms/asset/1237a616-a98c-4c8b-84c5-0e85a7aae6f5/talc_a_2242439_f0002_b.jpg)
Figure 3. Acrobates magicus sp. nov. A–C, QM F61153 holotype. A, occlusal view, Ri1–m4; B, C, occlusal stereopair, Rp3–m4. D–G, QM F61154, Ri1, p2–m2. D, buccal view; E, lingual view; F, G, occlusal stereopair. Scale = 2 mm. [169 mm width].
![Figure 3. Acrobates magicus sp. nov. A–C, QM F61153 holotype. A, occlusal view, Ri1–m4; B, C, occlusal stereopair, Rp3–m4. D–G, QM F61154, Ri1, p2–m2. D, buccal view; E, lingual view; F, G, occlusal stereopair. Scale = 2 mm. [169 mm width].](/cms/asset/0b213ed1-1b83-401e-bc23-3f0080ee223b/talc_a_2242439_f0003_b.jpg)
Figure 4. Acrobates pettitorum sp. nov., QM F61169 holotype, Lm1. A, buccal view; B, C, occlusal stereopair. Scale = 1 mm. [169 mm width].
![Figure 4. Acrobates pettitorum sp. nov., QM F61169 holotype, Lm1. A, buccal view; B, C, occlusal stereopair. Scale = 1 mm. [169 mm width].](/cms/asset/7917652b-8866-4152-b291-9a5bb57e393a/talc_a_2242439_f0004_b.jpg)
Table 3. Univariate statistics for Acrobates pygmaeus, Acrobates magicus sp. nov. and Acrobates pettitorum sp. nov. Measurements (mm).
Table 4. Univariate statistics for Distoechurus pennatus and Distoechurus georginae sp. nov. Measurements (mm).
Figure 5. Results of Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of 10 dental measurements of p2 and m1–3 for Acrobates pygmaeus, Acrobates magicus sp. nov. and Distoechurus pennatus. [81 mm width].
![Figure 5. Results of Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of 10 dental measurements of p2 and m1–3 for Acrobates pygmaeus, Acrobates magicus sp. nov. and Distoechurus pennatus. [81 mm width].](/cms/asset/943d09e6-1928-4b17-bab1-ecbe76b2e7c1/talc_a_2242439_f0005_c.jpg)
Table 5. Summary statistics of principal components analysis using 10 measurements of p2 and m1–3 of A. pygmaeus, A. magicus sp. nov. and D. pennatus.
Figure 6. Single most parsimonious tree from the unordered analysis with bootstrap, jackknife and Bremer support values given. Bootstrap and jackknife support values in blue, with jackknife values given in parentheses, Bremer support values given in red. No jackknife value is given when support value is below 50. [169 mm width].
![Figure 6. Single most parsimonious tree from the unordered analysis with bootstrap, jackknife and Bremer support values given. Bootstrap and jackknife support values in blue, with jackknife values given in parentheses, Bremer support values given in red. No jackknife value is given when support value is below 50. [169 mm width].](/cms/asset/c1d1913b-e242-4f57-9d04-8468ff411594/talc_a_2242439_f0006_c.jpg)
Figure 7. Strict consensus of the three most parsimonious trees in the ordered analysis. Bootstrap and jackknife support values in blue, with jackknife values given in parentheses and Bremer support values given in red. No jackknife value is given when support value is below 50. All character transformations are listed. [169 mm width].
![Figure 7. Strict consensus of the three most parsimonious trees in the ordered analysis. Bootstrap and jackknife support values in blue, with jackknife values given in parentheses and Bremer support values given in red. No jackknife value is given when support value is below 50. All character transformations are listed. [169 mm width].](/cms/asset/c088071b-7d03-4665-87e0-28d56aaca18e/talc_a_2242439_f0007_c.jpg)
List of specimens used for morphometric and phylogenetic analyses in this study