Exploring new frontiers of education using humanoid robots – a case study of patient centred innovation in digital health education

Figures & data

Table 1. Means and standard deviations of the MTUQD, DDS, DES and LER total and subscale scores.

Mean and standard deviations of measure subscales and total scores
MTUQD	M	SD
Ease of Use and Learning	4.33	0.49
Interface Quality	4.33	0.57
Interaction Quality	3.84	0.43
Reliability	3.89	0.73
Satisfaction and Future Use	3.83	0.54
Total	4.01	0.43
DES	M	SD
Managing the Psychological Aspects of Diabetes	4.00	0.49
Assessing Dissatisfaction and Readiness to Change	3.71	0.80
Setting and Achieving Diabetes Goals	3.88	0.61
Total	3.85	0.57
DDS	M	SD
Emotional Burden	2.60	1.23
Physician-related Distress	2.20	1.31
Regimen-related Distress	1.36	0.74
Interpersonal Distress	1.37	0.48
Total	1.97	0.85
LER	M	SD
Authenticity	3.70	0.79
Engagement	3.67	0.57
Learning Motivation	3.77	0.90
Total	3.71	0.67

Figure 1. Knowledge transfer scores at baseline and post-intervention.

Table 2. Means and standard deviations of between groups knowledge transfer scores at baseline and follow-up.

Knowledge transfer scores
	Pre-test		Post-test
Gender	M	SD	M	SD
Male	4.44	1.94	6.33	2.18
Female	4.50	3.00	4.75	3.40

Table 3. Summary of inter-correlations between knowledge transfer scores and the MTUQD subscales.

	1	2	3	4	5	6
1. Knowledge Transfer	–
2. Ease of Use of Learning	0.391	–
3. Interface Quality	0.229	0.759**	–
4. Interaction Quality	0.084	0.558*	0.855**	–
5. Reliability	−0.207	0.366	0.647*	0.689**	–
6. Satisfaction and Future Use	−0.521*	0.023	0.372	0.396	0.727**	–

Note: *p < .05, **p < .01.