405
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Pejorative phrases or innocent idioms? Exploring terms used by tomorrow’s doctors in relation to older people

, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 551-561 | Published online: 15 Oct 2018
 

ABSTRACT

Older people are the “core business” for 21st century hospitals. Of concern, therefore, is negative stereotyping of older people by medical students. Through a bespoke teaching session for final-year medical students, we aimed to deconstruct the phraseology they employed in relation to older people and to drive attitudinal change among students. This study also aimed to discern whether there was a detectable difference in attitudes toward older people after the session. Forty-seven medical students participated. Students recorded in a “word-cloud” terms they associated with older people in hospital before and after the session. The University of California Los Angeles Geriatrics Attitude Scale (UCLA-GAS) was administered for pre-session. The intervention students, along with a control group, completed this instrument at the end of their placement. Content analysis of word cloud data was performed—an iterative, transparent, structured approach to analysis, along with external critique of findings and collaborative triangulation ensured rigor of analysis. Qualitative analysis demonstrated the use of pejorative and sometimes nihilistic terms. There were evidence of growing appreciation of the inherent complexity of caring for older people and increasing awareness of how healthcare systems can be challenging for older people. Quantitative analysis revealed that there is no statistical difference neither between the UCLA-GAS pre- and post-teaching nor the intervention and control groups. In conclusion, a bespoke educational intervention, designed to promote student reflection on their views toward older people in hospital, can be a catalyst to challenging superficial and stereotypical views.

Disclosure statement

All authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sponsor’s Role

The study’s sponsor (Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust) had no direct influence on design, methods, subject recruitment, data collections, analysis, or preparation of the article.

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Ellen Tullo

Ellen Tullo As follows: study concept and design (JF, ET, JS), acquisition of subjects and/or data (JF), analysis and interpretation of data (JF, ET, JS), and preparation of manuscript (JF, ET, JS).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 172.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.