195
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Home confinement during COVID-19 pandemic reduced physical activity but not health-related quality of life in previously active older women

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 250-259 | Published online: 31 Jan 2022
 

ABSTRACT

We investigate the effect of COVID-19 home confinement on levels of physical activity, sedentary behavior, and health-related quality of life (HRQL) in older women previously participating in exercise and educational programs. Our hypothesis was that home confinement would result in a reduction in levels of physical activity, an increase in sedentary behavior, and a reduction in HRQL. Sixty-four older women (age = 72 ± 5 yrs) under home confinement who participated in a physical exercise/educational program had their levels of physical activity, sedentary behavior, and HRQL assessed before and during (11 to 13 weeks after the introduction of government recommendations to reduce virus transmission) COVID-19 pandemic. There were significant reductions in total physical activity (−259 METs/week, P = .02), as a result of a ~17.0% reduction in walking (−30.8 min/week, P = .004) and ~41.8% reduction in vigorous-intensity activity (−29.6 min/week, P < .001). Sedentary behavior also increased (2.24 h/week, P < .001; 1.07 h/week days, P < .001; and 1.54 h/weekend days, P < .001). However, no significant change occurred in moderate-intensity physical activity, and HRQL domains and facets, except for an improvement in the environment domain. Home confinement due to COVID-19 pandemic decreased levels of physical activity and increased levels of sedentary behavior in previously active older women. However, there were no significant changes in HRQL. These results suggest that educational programs promoting healthy behaviors may attenuate the impact of home confinement in older women.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Data availability statement

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Author’s contributions

EGC and VTA prepared the study, supervised the division of tasks, and participated in study design, data analysis, and manuscript writing. VTA also participated in literature review, and data collection. TCS, FBS, YVM, PHCW, and MMSC participated in data collection. IRM and BF participated in data analysis and manuscript writing. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Additional information

Funding

VTA and BF were supported by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES – Finance Code 001). IRM was supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP # 2018/09695-5). PHCW and EGC were supported by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientı́fico e Tecnológico (CNPq # 134472/2020-9 and #303399/2018-0, respectively). The results of the present study are presented clearly, honestly, and without fabrication, falsification, or inappropriate data manipulation.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 172.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.