Publication Cover
Experimental Aging Research
An International Journal Devoted to the Scientific Study of the Aging Process
Volume 30, 2004 - Issue 1
133
Views
21
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Aging and Probabilistic Learning in Single- and Multiple-Cue Tasks

, , , , &
Pages 23-45 | Received 01 Jul 2002, Accepted 01 Mar 2003, Published online: 17 Aug 2010
 

Abstract

The objective of the study was to examine some of the conditions under which elderly people are able to learn probabilistic inverse relationships and when this type of learning is no longer possible. Two kind of tasks were used: (a) two single-cue learning tasks with either direct or inverse relationships (the Single-Cue Probability Learning paradigm), and (b) three two-cue learning tasks, one with two direct relationships, one with a combination of direct and inverse relationships, and one with two inverse relationships (the Multiple-Cue Probability Learning paradigm). Four groups of participants were included in the study: young adults (18- to 25-year-olds), adults (40- to 50-year-olds), elderly people (65- to 74-year-olds), and very elderly people (75- to 90-year-olds). It was shown that (a) older adults are able to reject the direct relationship “default” hypothesis and select the inverse relationship hypothesis when outcome feedback contradicting the default hypothesis is given, and provided that the learning setting be a very simple one, involving only one cue; (b) some older adults are able to select the inverse relationship hypothesis provided that the learning setting be a simple one, involving only two inverse relationship cues; and (c) very few older adults are able to select the inverse relationship hypothesis when the learning setting is a complex one, involving two cues with both direct and inverse relationships with the criterion. These results led to the revision of the “gradual decrease of cognitive flexibility in older adults” hypothesis proposed by Chasseigne, Mullet, and Stewart (Acta Psychologic`a, 103, 229–238, 1997).

This work was supported by the UPRES Vieillissement et Développment Cognitif (François-Rabelais University), and by the UMR Travail et Cognition (Mirail University). The authors are grateful to Stacey Callahan for her thoughtful comments on an earlier draft of this article.

Notes

1Other modeling methods can be used for lens model analysis. The LME holds as long as the E's and the 's are uncorrelated.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 372.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.