1,208
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

A robustness evaluation of Bayesian tests for longitudinal data

& ORCID Icon
Pages 8754-8775 | Received 02 Jul 2020, Accepted 16 Mar 2021, Published online: 14 Apr 2021

Figures & data

Figure 1. The density function of EP2(μ,Σ,κ) displayed for κ=(0.5,1,5). Special cases of multivariate Laplace in (a) and multivariate normal in (b).

Figure 1. The density function of EP2(μ,Σ,κ) displayed for κ=(0.5,1,5). Special cases of multivariate Laplace in (a) and multivariate normal in (b).

Sampler 1: LMM.

Sampler 2: one-way-ANOVA.

Figure 2. Posterior median of the mixture weight for each κ with pe=0.2,pb=0.2 and f = 6.

Figure 2. Posterior median of the mixture weight for each κ with pe=0.2,pb=0.2 and f = 6.

Figure 3. Posterior median of the mixture weight for each combination of κ, pe and f with pb = 0.

Figure 3. Posterior median of the mixture weight for each combination of κ, pe and f with pb = 0.

Figure 4. Cancer data.

Figure 4. Cancer data.

Figure 5. Posterior sample of the mixture weight for the hypotheses of no treatment effect.

Figure 5. Posterior sample of the mixture weight for the hypotheses of no treatment effect.

Figure 6. Trace plots of the kurtosis parameter, treatment and week fixed effect coefficients, error variance and elements of the random effects covariance based on Sampler 1.

Figure 6. Trace plots of the kurtosis parameter, treatment and week fixed effect coefficients, error variance and elements of the random effects covariance based on Sampler 1.

Figure 7. Posterior samples of the random effects of individuals with id 6 and 14.

Figure 7. Posterior samples of the random effects of individuals with id 6 and 14.

Figure 8. Posterior density of the mixture weights with the kurtosis parameter treated as a hyper-parameter.

Figure 8. Posterior density of the mixture weights with the kurtosis parameter treated as a hyper-parameter.

Figure 9. PAA data.

Figure 9. PAA data.

Figure 10. Posterior sample of the mixture weight for the hypotheses of the fixed effect equal to 0.5.

Figure 10. Posterior sample of the mixture weight for the hypotheses of the fixed effect equal to 0.5.

Figure 11. Trace plots of the kurtosis parameter, treatment coefficient and error and random effects variance based on Sampler 2.

Figure 11. Trace plots of the kurtosis parameter, treatment coefficient and error and random effects variance based on Sampler 2.

Figure 12. Posterior samples of random coefficients for individuals with id 1 and 20.

Figure 12. Posterior samples of random coefficients for individuals with id 1 and 20.

Figure 13. Posterior density of the mixture weights with the kurtosis parameter treated as a hyper-parameter.

Figure 13. Posterior density of the mixture weights with the kurtosis parameter treated as a hyper-parameter.

Figure 14. Posterior density of the mixture weights with the kurtosis parameter treated as a hyper-parameter.

Figure 14. Posterior density of the mixture weights with the kurtosis parameter treated as a hyper-parameter.