173
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Evaluation of disparities in perceived healthcare discrimination among BRCA1/2-positive women from medically underserved populations

, PhDORCID Icon & , PhD, MPHORCID Icon
Pages 539-550 | Received 09 Mar 2023, Accepted 11 Jul 2023, Published online: 18 Jul 2023
 

ABSTRACT

The current study evaluated associations between disparities relating to race/ethnicity, poverty status, educational status, and odds of experiencing healthcare discrimination among women with BRCA1/2 mutations. We conducted a cross-sectional study of United States (US)-based women (18+ years) who have tested positive for BRCA1/2 mutations within the past 5 years and who identify with one or more medically underserved populations. 211 women were recruited from BRCA1/2-oriented support groups and completed an online survey. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95 percent confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using multivariable logistic regression models for associations between race/ethnicity, poverty status, education, and perceived healthcare discrimination adjusting for covariates. 182 women were included (31.3 percent were cancer survivors). Most were NHW (67.2 percent) and younger than 50 years (83.2 percent). Racial/ethnic minorities were 2.6 times more likely to report receiving poorer service than NHW women (95 percent CI, 1.26–5.33, p = .01). Associations with poverty status, education, and healthcare discrimination outcomes were not statistically significant. Improving patient-provider interactions that can contribute to medical mistrust should become a priority for the care of high-risk US minority women with BRCA1/2 mutations.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge all of the BRCA1/2-positive women who shared their experiences with us.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, KED, upon reasonable request.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Johns Hopkins Ho-Ching Yang Memorial Faculty Award. KED received research support from the National Cancer Institute [T32CA009314] Cancer Epidemiology, Prevention, and Control training program.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 444.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.