Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of student verbal and nonverbal responsiveness on teacher self‐efficacy and job satisfaction. Over a quarter (26%) of the total variance in teacher self‐efficacy and over half (53%) of the total variance in teacher job satisfaction were attributable to student verbal and nonverbal responsiveness. Rather than student verbal and nonverbal responsiveness interacting, the analyses of variance yielded significant main effects for both the verbal responsiveness and nonverbal responsiveness independent variables on each of the teacher self‐efficacy and job satisfaction dependent variables. Overall, student nonverbal responsiveness had a greater effect on teacher self‐efficacy and job satisfaction than verbal responsiveness. Also, teacher job satisfaction was more susceptible to student verbal and nonverbal responsiveness than teacher self‐efficacy. Limitations and implications are reviewed.
Notes
Timothy P. Mottet (EdD, West Virginia University, 1998) is an Associate Professor of Communication Studies, Steven A. Beebe (PhD, University of Missouri, 1976) is a Professor and Chair of Communication Studies, and Paul C. Raffeld (PhD, University of Oregon, 1973) is Professor of Psychology and Director of the Testing Center at Texas State University‐San Marcos 601 University Dr., San Marcos, TX, 78666. Amanda L. Medlock (MA, Texas State University‐San Marcos, 2001) is a Visiting Instructor at Truman State University in Kirksville, Missouri. A faculty research enhancement grant from Texas State University‐San Marcos funded this study. Timothy P. Mottet can be contacted at [email protected]