68
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

A review of the nematode assemblages of the genus Perameles (Peramelidae), Australian bandicoots, held in the South Australian Museum

ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Pages 173-189 | Received 16 May 2023, Accepted 19 Jul 2023, Published online: 02 Aug 2023
 

ABSTRACT

A total of 210 vials of nematodes collected from four species of Perameles (representing 15 individuals of P. bougainville, 83 of P. gunnii, 54 of P. nasuta and 19 of P. pallescens) held in the Australian Helminthological Collection of the South Australian Museum were examined. Nematodes were identified and parasite assemblages of the four hosts were compared. Using only the number of nematodes identified to species as an indicator of diversity, the nematode community of P. bougainville was the most depauperate (4 species) followed by P. gunnii (11 species), P. pallescens (12 species) and P. nasuta (20 species). None of the species were found in all four hosts. Excluding P. bougainville, Sorensen’s index of similarity showed that P. gunnii and P. pallescens had the least similar, 0.26, and P. pallescens and P. nasuta the most similar, 0.50, nematode communities. Linstowinema warringtoni Smales, 1997, Mackerrastrongylus peramelis (Johnston & Mawson, 1938) and Peramelistrongylus skedastos Mawson, 1960 were found in three hosts, P. gunnii, P. nasuta and P. pallescens. Each of the four hosts had a unique species profile: four species of Physaloptera being found in P. nasuta, three in P. pallescens, one in P. gunnii and none in P. bougainville. Of the trichostrongyloids, Mackerrastrongylus peramelis was the most prevalent in P. pallescens and Peramelistrongylus skedastos in P. gunnii and P. nasuta. The influence of nematode collection techniques, sample sizes and host geographic range and ecology may have had on the assemblages we observed is discussed.

Acknowledgments

Thanks are due to staff of the South Australian Museum, Adelaide for providing access to the material. Librarians from Central Queensland University provided Document Delivery Services.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Ethical approval

This study was conducted in compliance with all institutional, national, and international guidelines for the care and use of animals.

Additional information

Funding

This contribution received no funding support.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 352.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.