Local participation in transfrontier tourism: Case of Sengwe community in Great Limpopo Transfrontier Conservation Area, Zimbabwe

Figures & data

Figure 1. Location of study area wards (Wards 13, 14 and 15 are located adjacent to GNP) (see Chirozva et al., 2013).

Table 1. Biographic details of interviewees (n = 177).

Characteristic	Detail	Frequency	%	n
Gender	Female	86	48	177
	Male	91	52
Age	18 to 25 years	21	12	177
	26 to 30 years	24	14
	31 to 40 years	52	29
	41 to 50 years 51 to 60 years Above 60 years	29 26 25	16 15 14
Educational qualification	Primary	93	53	177
	Secondary	52	29
	Never been to school	27	15
	College University	4 1	2 0.6

Table 2. Community hindrances to participate in tourism business enterprise (n = 280).

Hindrance/barrier	Frequency	%
Technical knowhow	117	42
Poor resource governance	126	45
Lack of capital	37	13
Total	280	100

Table 3. Community involvement in GLTFCA programmes (n = 128).

Activity	Frequency	%
Conservation	53	41
Local level policing	7	6
Don’t know	68	53
Total	128	100

Table 4. Community access to wildlife resources (n = 170).

Response	Frequency	%
Yes	55	32
No	115	68
Total	170	100

Chirozva, C, Mukamuri, BB, & Manjengwa, J, 2013. Using scenario planning for stakeholder engagement in livelihood futures in the Great Limpopo Transfrontier Conservation Area. Development Southern Africa 30(6), 771–88. doi: 10.1080/0376835X.2013.859065

 Web of Science ®Google Scholar