7,184
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Multidimensional poverty in South Africa in 2001–16

&

Figures & data

Table 1. Dimensions, indicators, deprivation cut-offs and weights for the MPI.

Figure 1. Proportion (%) of population deprived in each indicator. Source: Authors’ calculations using the Census 2001, CS 2007, Census 2011 and CS 2016 data.

Note: the 2016 deprivation proportions of indicators [K] (overcrowding) and [L] (unemployment) are not available.

Figure 1. Proportion (%) of population deprived in each indicator. Source: Authors’ calculations using the Census 2001, CS 2007, Census 2011 and CS 2016 data.Note: the 2016 deprivation proportions of indicators [K] (overcrowding) and [L] (unemployment) are not available.

Table 2. Multidimensional poverty by province, 2001–2016.

Table 3. The 10 district councils with the greatest absolute decline in MPI.

Figure 2. MPI decomposition (%) by province using weighting scheme (I), 2001–2011. Source: Authors’ calculations using the Census 2001, CS 2007 and Census 2011 data.

Figure 2. MPI decomposition (%) by province using weighting scheme (I), 2001–2011. Source: Authors’ calculations using the Census 2001, CS 2007 and Census 2011 data.

Figure 3. MPI decomposition (%) by province using weighting scheme (II), 2001–2016. Source: Authors’ calculations using the Census 2001, CS 2007, Census 2011 and CS 2016 data.

Figure 3. MPI decomposition (%) by province using weighting scheme (II), 2001–2016. Source: Authors’ calculations using the Census 2001, CS 2007, Census 2011 and CS 2016 data.

Table 4. MPI decomposition (%) by indicator, 2001–2011.

Table 5. MPI in each population quintile using weighting scheme (I), 2001–2011.

Figure 4. Proportion (%) of population in each poverty status category. Source: Authors’ calculations using the Census 2001, CS 2007 and Census 2011 data.

Figure 4. Proportion (%) of population in each poverty status category. Source: Authors’ calculations using the Census 2001, CS 2007 and Census 2011 data.

Table A1. Available information relating to the MPI indicators in the Censuses and Community Surveys, 1996–2016.

Table A2. Comparability of district councils across censuses and community surveys.

Table A3. Proportion of population (%) deprived in each indicator by gender, race and area type, 2001–2016.

Table A4. Proportion of population (%) deprived in each indicator by province, 2001–2016.

Table A5. Proportion of population (%) deprived in each indicator by district council, 2001.

Table A6. Proportion of population (%) deprived in each indicator by district council, 2016.

Table A7. Multidimensional poverty by gender, race and area type, 2001–2016.

Table A8. MPI and income poverty by district council using weighting scheme (I), 2001–2011.

Table A9. MPI by district council using weighting scheme (II), 2001–2016.

Table A10. The 10 least and 10 most deprived municipalities in 2011 (using weighting scheme (I)) and 2016 (using weighting scheme (II)).

Table A11. MPI decomposition (%) by gender, race, area type and province, 2001–2016.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.