364
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Who benefits from the South African Child Support Grant?: The role of gender and birthweight

ORCID Icon

Figures & data

Table 1. Summary statistics.

Table 2. Delay equation.

Table 3. First three moments after entropy balancing.

Table 4. Effect of CSG with and without low birthweight.

Table 5. Results disaggregated by gender.

Figure 1. Unconditional quantile effect of CSG.

Figure 1. Unconditional quantile effect of CSG.

Figure 2. Unconditional quantile regression for boys.

Figure 2. Unconditional quantile regression for boys.

Figure 3. Unconditional quantile regression for girls.

Figure 3. Unconditional quantile regression for girls.

Table 6. Effect of low birthweight.

Figure 4. Quantile effect of low birthweight.

Figure 4. Quantile effect of low birthweight.

Table A1. Summary statistics when low birthweight is the treatment variable.

Figure A1. Quantile effect (Conditional quantile regression).

Figure A1. Quantile effect (Conditional quantile regression).

Table A2. Effect of CSG with and without low birthweight when the estimation of motivation excludes the caregiver relationship.

Figure A2. Unconditional quantile effect of CSG when the estimation of motivation excludes the caregiver relationship.

Figure A2. Unconditional quantile effect of CSG when the estimation of motivation excludes the caregiver relationship.

Table A3. Results disaggregated by gender when the estimation of motivation excludes the caregiver relationship.

Figure A3. Unconditional quantile regression for boys when the estimation of motivation excludes the caregiver relationship.

Figure A3. Unconditional quantile regression for boys when the estimation of motivation excludes the caregiver relationship.

Figure A4. Unconditional quantile regression for girls when the estimation of motivation excludes the caregiver relationship.

Figure A4. Unconditional quantile regression for girls when the estimation of motivation excludes the caregiver relationship.

Table A4. Effect of low birthweight when the estimation of motivation excludes the caregiver relationship.

Figure A5. Quantile effect of low birthweight when the estimation of motivation excludes the caregiver relationship

Figure A5. Quantile effect of low birthweight when the estimation of motivation excludes the caregiver relationship

Table A5. Effect of CSG with and without low birthweight (birthweight<2.3 kg).

Figure A6. Unconditional quantile effect of CSG (birthweight<2.3 kg).

Figure A6. Unconditional quantile effect of CSG (birthweight<2.3 kg).

Table A6. Results disaggregated by gender (birthweight<2.3 kg).

Figure A7. Unconditional quantile regression for boys (birthweight<2.3 kg).

Figure A7. Unconditional quantile regression for boys (birthweight<2.3 kg).

Figure A8. Unconditional quantile regression for girls (birthweight<2.3 kg).

Figure A8. Unconditional quantile regression for girls (birthweight<2.3 kg).

Table A7. Effect of low birthweight (birthweight<2.3 kg)

Figure A9. Quantile effect of low birthweight when the estimation of motivation excludes the caregiver relationship.

Figure A9. Quantile effect of low birthweight when the estimation of motivation excludes the caregiver relationship.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.