2,119
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Threats to groundwater resources in urbanizing watersheds: The Waterloo Moraine and beyond

, &
Pages 193-208 | Received 02 Jan 2014, Accepted 09 Feb 2014, Published online: 25 Jun 2014

Figures & data

Figure 1. Waterloo Region with its three cities and four rural townships, also showing the Waterloo Moraine (shaded grey).

Figure 1. Waterloo Region with its three cities and four rural townships, also showing the Waterloo Moraine (shaded grey).

Figure 2. Well fields in the Region of Waterloo. Well fields discussed in this paper are labelled.

Figure 2. Well fields in the Region of Waterloo. Well fields discussed in this paper are labelled.

Figure 3. Urban growth in the area of the Greenbrook well field from (a) 1950 to (b) 2000. Figure b also shows the capture zone for the well field obtained from the 280-year capture probability plume (from Bester et al. Citation2006, with permission).

Figure 3. Urban growth in the area of the Greenbrook well field from (a) 1950 to (b) 2000. Figure 3b also shows the capture zone for the well field obtained from the 280-year capture probability plume (from Bester et al. Citation2006, with permission).

Table 1. Threats to drinking water in urban and rural areas (adapted from Ontario Ministry of the Environment Citation2006).

Figure 4. Well vulnerability maps for the Greenbrook well field: (a) maximum relative concentration (C/C0) expected at the well field due to a potential source (reference point X) within the capture zone, (b) time taken to reach maximum concentration at the well field, (c) time taken to breach threshold value of 10−4 relative to source concentration, (d) exposure time to concentrations above threshold value. Map values at X are values expected at well for source at X (from Frind et al. Citation2006, with permission).

Figure 4. Well vulnerability maps for the Greenbrook well field: (a) maximum relative concentration (C/C0) expected at the well field due to a potential source (reference point X) within the capture zone, (b) time taken to reach maximum concentration at the well field, (c) time taken to breach threshold value of 10−4 relative to source concentration, (d) exposure time to concentrations above threshold value. Map values at X are values expected at well for source at X (from Frind et al. Citation2006, with permission).

Figure 5. Simulated well capture zones for a municipal well within the Mannheim well field, Region of Waterloo. Capture zones correspond to three different boundary scenarios in terms of the spatial distribution of recharge, generated by the models HydroGeoSphere, GAWSER/MODFLOW and WATFLOW, respectively (adapted from Sousa et al. Citation2013a).

Figure 5. Simulated well capture zones for a municipal well within the Mannheim well field, Region of Waterloo. Capture zones correspond to three different boundary scenarios in terms of the spatial distribution of recharge, generated by the models HydroGeoSphere, GAWSER/MODFLOW and WATFLOW, respectively (adapted from Sousa et al. Citation2013a).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.