670
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Papers

Detection and attribution of variability and trends in streamflow records from the Canadian Prairie Provinces

, , , &
Pages 270-284 | Received 04 Feb 2014, Accepted 10 Mar 2014, Published online: 08 Sep 2014

Figures & data

Figure 1. The 86 naturally flowing streamflow records (squares) from the Canadian Prairie Provinces used in this study (Lambert equal area projection).

Figure 1. The 86 naturally flowing streamflow records (squares) from the Canadian Prairie Provinces used in this study (Lambert equal area projection).

Table 1. Eighty-six naturally flowing river discharge records from the Prairie Provinces, including Water Survey of Canada (WSC) station codes.

Figure 2. (a) Histogram of the 86 Canadian Prairie Provinces’ naturally flowing streamflow record lengths (years) from Table . (b) Histogram of the drainage areas (km2) of the 86 naturally flowing streams. The x-axis numbers list the potentially largest number in that bin.

Figure 2. (a) Histogram of the 86 Canadian Prairie Provinces’ naturally flowing streamflow record lengths (years) from Table 1. (b) Histogram of the drainage areas (km2) of the 86 naturally flowing streams. The x-axis numbers list the potentially largest number in that bin.

Figure 3. Plots of the November–March Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO), December–February Pacific North American mode (PNA), negative November–March North Pacific Index (NPI), negative June–November Southern Oscillation Index (SOI) and December–March Arctic Oscillation (AO) for 1900–2010. The dotted lines mark the strong positive and strong negative climate oscillation events (see Table

Table 2. Classification of years into strong positive and negative climate oscillation events for the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO), Pacific North American mode (PNA), North Pacific Index (NPI), Southern Oscillation Index (SOI) and Arctic Oscillation (AO).

).

Figure 3. Plots of the November–March Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO), December–February Pacific North American mode (PNA), negative November–March North Pacific Index (NPI), negative June–November Southern Oscillation Index (SOI) and December–March Arctic Oscillation (AO) for 1900–2010. The dotted lines mark the strong positive and strong negative climate oscillation events (see Table Table 2. Classification of years into strong positive and negative climate oscillation events for the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO), Pacific North American mode (PNA), North Pacific Index (NPI), Southern Oscillation Index (SOI) and Arctic Oscillation (AO).Download CSVDisplay Table2).

Table 2. Classification of years into strong positive and negative climate oscillation events for the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO), Pacific North American mode (PNA), North Pacific Index (NPI), Southern Oscillation Index (SOI) and Arctic Oscillation (AO).

Figure 4. (a) Correlation plot between same year winter (November–March) mean Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) and concurrent precipitation for 1950–2005. (b) Correlation plot between same year winter (December–February) mean Pacific North American mode (PNA) and concurrent precipitation. (c) Correlation plot between same year winter (November–March) mean North Pacific Index (NPI) and concurrent precipitation. (d) Correlation plot between June–November mean Southern Ocean Index (SOI) and following year winter (December–March) precipitation. (e) Correlation plot between same year winter (December–March) mean Arctic Oscillation (AO) and concurrent precipitation.

Figure 4. (a) Correlation plot between same year winter (November–March) mean Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) and concurrent precipitation for 1950–2005. (b) Correlation plot between same year winter (December–February) mean Pacific North American mode (PNA) and concurrent precipitation. (c) Correlation plot between same year winter (November–March) mean North Pacific Index (NPI) and concurrent precipitation. (d) Correlation plot between June–November mean Southern Ocean Index (SOI) and following year winter (December–March) precipitation. (e) Correlation plot between same year winter (December–March) mean Arctic Oscillation (AO) and concurrent precipitation.

Table 3. Empirical probabilities of two successive years of least quartile and highest quartile flows composited according to the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) phase for the long Prairie records. The Water Survey of Canada (WSC) codes are given for the added regulated flow records.

Figure 5. The nine naturally flowing and 11 regulated long continuous streamflow records used in the analysis of the effect of the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) on the probability of two successive years of low or high flows.

Figure 5. The nine naturally flowing and 11 regulated long continuous streamflow records used in the analysis of the effect of the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) on the probability of two successive years of low or high flows.

Figure 6. Geographic pattern of trends in 86 naturally flowing mean daily streamflow records, annualized over January–December from the Canadian Prairie Provinces as assessed by a modified Mann-Kendall test. A down (up) arrow denotes a decreasing (increasing) trend. A large arrow denotes significance at the p ≤ 0.05 level, a small arrow denotes significance at the 0.05 < p ≤ 0.1 level and a square denotes no trend. (a) Full variable period of record analyzed. (b) 1962–2010 analyzed.

Figure 6. Geographic pattern of trends in 86 naturally flowing mean daily streamflow records, annualized over January–December from the Canadian Prairie Provinces as assessed by a modified Mann-Kendall test. A down (up) arrow denotes a decreasing (increasing) trend. A large arrow denotes significance at the p ≤ 0.05 level, a small arrow denotes significance at the 0.05 < p ≤ 0.1 level and a square denotes no trend. (a) Full variable period of record analyzed. (b) 1962–2010 analyzed.

Figure 7. (a) Impacts of the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) on the 86 Prairie naturally flowing mean daily discharges. (b) Impacts of the Pacific North American mode (PNA) on the mean daily discharges. (c) Impacts of the North Pacific Index (NPI) on the mean daily discharges. (d) Impacts of the Southern Ocean Index (SOI) on the mean daily discharges. (e) Impacts of the Arctic Oscillation (AO) on the mean daily discharges. All assessed by permutation t-tests: a large symbol denotes significance at the p ≤ 0.05 level; a small symbol denotes significance at the 0.05 < p ≤ 0.1 level.

Figure 7. (a) Impacts of the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) on the 86 Prairie naturally flowing mean daily discharges. (b) Impacts of the Pacific North American mode (PNA) on the mean daily discharges. (c) Impacts of the North Pacific Index (NPI) on the mean daily discharges. (d) Impacts of the Southern Ocean Index (SOI) on the mean daily discharges. (e) Impacts of the Arctic Oscillation (AO) on the mean daily discharges. All assessed by permutation t-tests: a large symbol denotes significance at the p ≤ 0.05 level; a small symbol denotes significance at the 0.05 < p ≤ 0.1 level.

Figure 8. Mean probabilities and standard deviations of two successive years of least quartile and highest quartile flows composited according to Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) phase with standard deviations for the 22 long Prairie records. Also shown are the p-values from the paired permutation t-tests determining the significance of the mean Prairie-wide difference between the probability of two successive years of least (highest) quartile flow in a given river during the positive PDO phase versus the probability of two successive years of least (highest) quartile flow in the same river during the negative PDO phase.

Figure 8. Mean probabilities and standard deviations of two successive years of least quartile and highest quartile flows composited according to Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) phase with standard deviations for the 22 long Prairie records. Also shown are the p-values from the paired permutation t-tests determining the significance of the mean Prairie-wide difference between the probability of two successive years of least (highest) quartile flow in a given river during the positive PDO phase versus the probability of two successive years of least (highest) quartile flow in the same river during the negative PDO phase.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.