Figures & data
Fig. 1 Slit functions measured with an HeCd-laser for the single Brewer #037 and a double Brewer #107 at Izaña 2011. For Brewer #107 there are some spikes in the wing caused by internal reflections. On average, for Brewer #037 the relative intensity outside the triangular core is about two orders of magnitude higher than the relative intensity for Brewer #107.
![Fig. 1 Slit functions measured with an HeCd-laser for the single Brewer #037 and a double Brewer #107 at Izaña 2011. For Brewer #107 there are some spikes in the wing caused by internal reflections. On average, for Brewer #037 the relative intensity outside the triangular core is about two orders of magnitude higher than the relative intensity for Brewer #107.](/cms/asset/38044032-afc7-44eb-8f30-3630cf633c97/tato_a_871499_f0001_c.jpg)
Table 1. Slit function fits for Brewers #037 and #107. Fits have been divided into three parts: a triangular core with FWHM 0.6 nm, an exponentially decaying wing, and a flat outer region.
Fig. 4 Ratios, an, of modelled count rates of ozone retrieval wavelengths between Brewers with an ideal slit function (triangle, FWHM 0.6 nm) and with the Brewer #037 slit.
![Fig. 4 Ratios, an, of modelled count rates of ozone retrieval wavelengths between Brewers with an ideal slit function (triangle, FWHM 0.6 nm) and with the Brewer #037 slit.](/cms/asset/a9418b0f-76af-4d69-8990-676474955178/tato_a_871499_f0004_c.jpg)
Fig. 5 Additive correction β calculated from every simulated DS measurement using Eq. (7). To be used as a correction with real data, a representative fit has been made as a function of the single Brewer ozone slant column.
![Fig. 5 Additive correction β calculated from every simulated DS measurement using Eq. (7). To be used as a correction with real data, a representative fit has been made as a function of the single Brewer ozone slant column.](/cms/asset/02861760-2957-4ccd-9af8-a2f68b4b80e1/tato_a_871499_f0005_c.jpg)
Fig. 6 Brewer #037 ETC and absorption coefficients fitted for original and stray-light corrected data to match Brewer #157 at low air mass values.
![Fig. 6 Brewer #037 ETC and absorption coefficients fitted for original and stray-light corrected data to match Brewer #157 at low air mass values.](/cms/asset/976e27b1-5e74-4516-b312-b7e8cbeabae2/tato_a_871499_f0006_c.jpg)
Fig. 7 Relative difference between Brewer #037 total ozone columns and Brewer #185/#157 total ozone columns before and after stray-light correction.
![Fig. 7 Relative difference between Brewer #037 total ozone columns and Brewer #185/#157 total ozone columns before and after stray-light correction.](/cms/asset/23f53b8d-8111-4292-891e-a2007b005e79/tato_a_871499_f0007_c.jpg)