379
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Bacteria and phytoplasmas / Bactéries et phytoplasmes

Specific identification and detection of Pantoea stewartii subsp. stewartii using a membrane-based multi-gene oligonucleotide array

Pages 414-426 | Accepted 24 Oct 2015, Published online: 18 Nov 2015

Figures & data

Table 1. Putative housekeeping genes, location on the array, code and oligonucleotide sequences evaluated in this study.

Fig. 1 Layout of multilocus oligonucleotides spotted on array. Uni506_16S was a positive control used to normalize hybridization intensity; NS, not spotted, negative control. 1, 16S rRNA; 2, leuS, 3, cpsD; 4, rpoB; 5, gyrB; 6, rpoB (b6 & c6) and leuS (d6). The corresponding sequences of all oligonucleotides are listed in .

Fig. 1 Layout of multilocus oligonucleotides spotted on array. Uni506_16S was a positive control used to normalize hybridization intensity; NS, not spotted, negative control. 1, 16S rRNA; 2, leuS, 3, cpsD; 4, rpoB; 5, gyrB; 6, rpoB (b6 & c6) and leuS (d6). The corresponding sequences of all oligonucleotides are listed in Table 1.

Fig. 2 Maximum likelihood inferred phylogenetic tree of Pantoea species from gyrB-leuS-rpoB concatenated sequences. Pantoea stewartii subsp. stewartii strains seem to be homogeneous while those of P. stewartii subsp. indologenes are heterogeneous. General time reversible substitution model was used with 1000 bootstrap replicates. Tatumella spp. used as outgroup.

Fig. 2 Maximum likelihood inferred phylogenetic tree of Pantoea species from gyrB-leuS-rpoB concatenated sequences. Pantoea stewartii subsp. stewartii strains seem to be homogeneous while those of P. stewartii subsp. indologenes are heterogeneous. General time reversible substitution model was used with 1000 bootstrap replicates. Tatumella spp. used as outgroup.

Fig. 3 Summary of hybridization patterns of multiplex digoxigenin-labelled PCR amplicons of Pantoea stewartii and other bacterial strains to an array of subspecies-, species- and group-specific oligonucleotides on nylon membranes. Chemiluminograms were scanned at 600 dpi using HP ScanJet 5590 scanner, and grey scale values of each dark spot, computed with ImageJ software and normalized using oligonucleotide Uni506_16S. Normalized signals are indicated by the following symbols: □, <0.1 (not detected); ▪, 0.15–0.39; ◘, 0.40–0.79; ■, >0.80. The locations of the oligonucleotides given at the top correspond to their locations on the membranes in the array. Oligonucleotides are presented in . The type strains were obtained from BCCM/LMG bacterial collection, Belgium or the Collection of Plant associated Bacteria (CFBP), France. Strains with prefixes SW or DC were kindly provided by Dr David Coplin.

Fig. 3 Summary of hybridization patterns of multiplex digoxigenin-labelled PCR amplicons of Pantoea stewartii and other bacterial strains to an array of subspecies-, species- and group-specific oligonucleotides on nylon membranes. Chemiluminograms were scanned at 600 dpi using HP ScanJet 5590 scanner, and grey scale values of each dark spot, computed with ImageJ software and normalized using oligonucleotide Uni506_16S. Normalized signals are indicated by the following symbols: □, <0.1 (not detected); ▪, 0.15–0.39; ◘, 0.40–0.79; ■, >0.80. The locations of the oligonucleotides given at the top correspond to their locations on the membranes in the array. Oligonucleotides are presented in Table 1. The type strains were obtained from BCCM/LMG bacterial collection, Belgium or the Collection of Plant associated Bacteria (CFBP), France. Strains with prefixes SW or DC were kindly provided by Dr David Coplin.

Fig. 3 (Continued.)

Fig. 3 (Continued.)

Fig. 4 Hybridization profiles of 18 Pantoea species and subspecies, Pectobacterium and Dickeya (former Erwinia members) and Tatumella punctata. Note specificity of detection of Pantoea stewartii subsp. stewartii LMG 2715T and differentiation from Pantoea stewartii subsp. indologenes based on oligonucleotide s1854rpoB (location c4).

Fig. 4 Hybridization profiles of 18 Pantoea species and subspecies, Pectobacterium and Dickeya (former Erwinia members) and Tatumella punctata. Note specificity of detection of Pantoea stewartii subsp. stewartii LMG 2715T and differentiation from Pantoea stewartii subsp. indologenes based on oligonucleotide s1854rpoB (location c4).

Fig. 5 Chemiluminograms showing specific detection of Pantoea stewartii subsp. stewartii DOAB 021 on corn plants infected or not under growth chamber conditions. a, non-infected plant, and b, infected plant. Leaf lesions (40 mg) were processed as described in Tambong et al. (Citation2008). No DNA extraction was performed. Four plants per treatments were analysed with consistent hybridization pattern obtained. Row numbers represent the different genes used: 1, 16S rRNA; 2, leuS; 3, cps; 4, rpoB; 5, gyrB; 6, mix: rpoB (b6 & c6) and leuS (d6) spotted on the membrane-based array.

Fig. 5 Chemiluminograms showing specific detection of Pantoea stewartii subsp. stewartii DOAB 021 on corn plants infected or not under growth chamber conditions. a, non-infected plant, and b, infected plant. Leaf lesions (40 mg) were processed as described in Tambong et al. (Citation2008). No DNA extraction was performed. Four plants per treatments were analysed with consistent hybridization pattern obtained. Row numbers represent the different genes used: 1, 16S rRNA; 2, leuS; 3, cps; 4, rpoB; 5, gyrB; 6, mix: rpoB (b6 & c6) and leuS (d6) spotted on the membrane-based array.

Fig. 6 Alignment of rpoB-derived oligonucleotide (s1854rpoB) sequences showing nucleotide mismatches and specificity to P. stewartii subsp. stewartii compared with other strains of Pantoea and Tatumella. Note nucleotide mismatches of oligonucleotide s1854rpoB are almost at the centre for effective differentiation.

Fig. 6 Alignment of rpoB-derived oligonucleotide (s1854rpoB) sequences showing nucleotide mismatches and specificity to P. stewartii subsp. stewartii compared with other strains of Pantoea and Tatumella. Note nucleotide mismatches of oligonucleotide s1854rpoB are almost at the centre for effective differentiation.
Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download MS Word (5.8 MB)

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.