As compact city planning rolls on, a look back: lessons from Sydney and Perth

ABSTRACT

This paper categorises and compares the policy frameworks that have encouraged higher density urban renewal in Sydney and Perth since the mid-2000s, which reflect the ‘compact city’ model that has become international urban planning orthodoxy. The policies can be grouped into four broad categories: (i) metropolitan strategies; (ii) transport and infrastructure plans; (iii) legislation creating development corporations; and (iv) planning system reforms. By comparing these policies, the paper identifies some key similarities and differences in how the compact city model has been adopted in Sydney and Perth. The most significant similarities are the changing power relationships reshaping urban planning and governance, and the ongoing challenges of integrating land-use and transport planning. The paper concludes with some brief commentary on the challenge these two issues pose for the next decade of compact planning, particularly for strategic planning bodies like the Greater Sydney Commission and the Western Australian Planning Commission.

KEYWORDS:

• Urban renewal
• compact city
• urban governance
• urban planning

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

ORCID

Laura Crommelin http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8626-352X

Laurence Troy http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4221-2760

Bill Randolph http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6815-0935

Notes

1 While the comparison and commentary in this paper are necessarily high-level, we note that this analysis draws on an extensive review of policies designed to encourage urban consolidation in Sydney and Perth, which is documented in detail in two working papers (Bunker 2015; Bunker and Troy 2016). In addition, see (Bunker et al. 2017) for a more detailed discussion of the review methodology.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Australian Research Council [grant number DP140100452].