Informality, power and relationships in postgraduate supervision: supervising PhD candidates over coffee

Abstract

A great deal of literature in recent years has focused on the supervisory relationship, yet very little has been written about the nature or content of supervisory meetings, beyond commenting on the frequency and length of meetings. Through semi-structured interviews, informal discussions with colleagues and students, a critical review of literature and personal reflection, this paper explores the salience of coffee for postgraduate supervision. This paper locates supervisions over coffee in reference to contemporary debates about the supervisory relationship (models, styles, tasks and dimensions). Using the concept of ‘third places’ and Misztal's theorisation of informality, it is argued that supervision over coffee conveys a particular supervisory relationship to postgraduate students: one that is incompatible with expert-disciple models or styles of supervision. Instead, supervision over coffee is on neutral territory and on a more informal footing. Finally the paper concludes with discussion about finding a balance between formality and informality in supervision and the development of personal and institutional trust.

Keywords:

• formality
• higher degree supervision
• supervisory meetings
• supervisory relationships
• third places

Acknowledgements

This paper developed out of the Exploring Supervision program of the University of Adelaide. My thanks to Ian Green and Cully Guerin for the opportunity to develop this idea and their comments on a short version of this paper. Thanks also to the insightful comments of the three anonymous reviewers that led to the deepening of the arguments in this paper. My thanks also to my colleagues who gave their thoughts and time to discuss the practices of postgraduate supervision. Thanks also to Martha Macintyre, who provided supportive and challenging supervision throughout my doctoral candidature.