135
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Judicial perspectives of the ideological significance of gross national happiness to the judiciary: Ensuring fair trial to self-represented criminal defendants in Bhutan

ORCID Icon
Pages 249-275 | Received 03 May 2020, Accepted 23 Nov 2020, Published online: 24 Dec 2020
 

Abstract

This article presents judicial perspectives on the relevance of Gross National Happiness (GNH) to the judiciary and its ideological significance in the specific context of ensuring fair trials to self-represented criminal defendants (SRCDs) and administering (criminal) justice in Bhutan. The article draws on the findings from semi-structured qualitative interviews with 16 Bhutanese Justices and Judges around the country. The findings suggest that GNH is judicially perceived as a legislated responsibility of the judiciary and an integral aspect of and highly influential on administering fair criminal justice to SRCDs in Bhutan. In practice, GNH as part of the judicial process can inspire a more humane and holistic approach to administering justice, contributing to fairer trials and more satisfied litigants, as well as more happiness in the justice sector.

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank the selfless guidance and support received in the preparation of this article from his PhD Supervisors Professor Heather Douglas and Associate Professor Francesca Bartlett (University of Queensland). Many thanks to the Honourable Former Chief Justice of Bhutan Lyonpo Tshering Wangchuk and the then Honourable Officiating Chief Justice of Bhutan Dasho Kuenley Tshering for authorising the conduct of qualitative study with the judiciary of Bhutan, the then Honourable Registrar General of Supreme Court Dasho Tshering Dorji for facilitating the study, and participating Justices and Judges for their participation and support in the research. The author also would like to thank the University of Queensland for the institutional and financial assistance, including ethics approval to conduct the research.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 255.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.