Figures & data
Figure 1: Top panel: rolling window estimates of the log-volatility (left) and log-kurtosis (right) for the S&P100’s constituents from 6th January 2000 to 3rd October 2020 (30 weeks window). Vertical bars indicate three reference dates: 6th July 2002, 23rd August 2008 and 22nd February 2020. Bottom panel: cross-sectional distribution of the log-volatility (left) and log-kurtosis (right) in three reference dates.
![Figure 1: Top panel: rolling window estimates of the log-volatility (left) and log-kurtosis (right) for the S&P100’s constituents from 6th January 2000 to 3rd October 2020 (30 weeks window). Vertical bars indicate three reference dates: 6th July 2002, 23rd August 2008 and 22nd February 2020. Bottom panel: cross-sectional distribution of the log-volatility (left) and log-kurtosis (right) in three reference dates.](/cms/asset/833ae2aa-8db7-45af-b30b-9cb9a3bae57d/ubes_a_2166049_f0001_b.jpg)
Figure 2: DAG of the Bayesian nonparametric panel MSGARCH model. It exhibits the hierarchical structure of the observations (boxes), the latent state variables
(gray circles), the parameters of the transition probability matrix
,
, the hyperparameters of the first stage
,
and of the second stage G (white circles). The directed arrows show the conditional independence structure of the model.
![Figure 2: DAG of the Bayesian nonparametric panel MSGARCH model. It exhibits the hierarchical structure of the observations yt=(y1t,…,yNt) (boxes), the latent state variables st=(s1t,…,sNt) (gray circles), the parameters of the transition probability matrix Pi=(pi,1,…,pi,K), θi=(μi,γi,αi,βi), the hyperparameters of the first stage R=(r1,…,rK), θ˜i∗=(μ˜i*,γ˜i*,α˜i*,β˜i*) and of the second stage G (white circles). The directed arrows show the conditional independence structure of the model.](/cms/asset/eff67b0f-7dcd-4e1f-983e-722561ff8ee3/ubes_a_2166049_f0002_b.jpg)
Figure 3: The posterior co-clustering matrix in regime 1 (left) and 2 (right) for expected returns (top) and volatility (bottom) identification constraints. In each block, gray shades represent the sector membership of the assets.
![Figure 3: The posterior co-clustering matrix in regime 1 (left) and 2 (right) for expected returns (top) and volatility (bottom) identification constraints. In each block, gray shades represent the sector membership of the assets.](/cms/asset/d442f54d-0a09-4adf-860d-9a14c7f38706/ubes_a_2166049_f0003_b.jpg)
Figure 4: Price-to-Earning for the assets in clusters of regime 1 (left) and of regime 2 (right), constraint on expected returns (top panel). Logarithm of implied volatility for the assets in clusters of regime 1 (left) and of regime 2 (right), constraint on volatility (bottom panel).
![Figure 4: Price-to-Earning for the assets in clusters of regime 1 (left) and of regime 2 (right), constraint on expected returns (top panel). Logarithm of implied volatility for the assets in clusters of regime 1 (left) and of regime 2 (right), constraint on volatility (bottom panel).](/cms/asset/bf0e5ca7-4e4e-4621-b2d8-1be0867a09c4/ubes_a_2166049_f0004_b.jpg)
Table 1: Out-of-sample evaluation. RMSE and CRPS.