2,077
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Bayesian Nonparametric Panel Markov-Switching GARCH Models

ORCID Icon, &

Figures & data

Figure 1: Top panel: rolling window estimates of the log-volatility (left) and log-kurtosis (right) for the S&P100’s constituents from 6th January 2000 to 3rd October 2020 (30 weeks window). Vertical bars indicate three reference dates: 6th July 2002, 23rd August 2008 and 22nd February 2020. Bottom panel: cross-sectional distribution of the log-volatility (left) and log-kurtosis (right) in three reference dates.

Figure 1: Top panel: rolling window estimates of the log-volatility (left) and log-kurtosis (right) for the S&P100’s constituents from 6th January 2000 to 3rd October 2020 (30 weeks window). Vertical bars indicate three reference dates: 6th July 2002, 23rd August 2008 and 22nd February 2020. Bottom panel: cross-sectional distribution of the log-volatility (left) and log-kurtosis (right) in three reference dates.

Figure 2: DAG of the Bayesian nonparametric panel MSGARCH model. It exhibits the hierarchical structure of the observations yt=(y1t,,yNt) (boxes), the latent state variables st=(s1t,,sNt) (gray circles), the parameters of the transition probability matrix Pi=(pi,1,,pi,K), θi=(μi,γi,αi,βi), the hyperparameters of the first stage R=(r1,,rK), θ˜i=(μ˜i*,γ˜i*,α˜i*,β˜i*) and of the second stage G (white circles). The directed arrows show the conditional independence structure of the model.

Figure 2: DAG of the Bayesian nonparametric panel MSGARCH model. It exhibits the hierarchical structure of the observations yt=(y1t,…,yNt) (boxes), the latent state variables st=(s1t,…,sNt) (gray circles), the parameters of the transition probability matrix Pi=(pi,1,…,pi,K), θi=(μi,γi,αi,βi), the hyperparameters of the first stage R=(r1,…,rK), θ˜i∗=(μ˜i*,γ˜i*,α˜i*,β˜i*) and of the second stage G (white circles). The directed arrows show the conditional independence structure of the model.

Figure 3: The posterior co-clustering matrix in regime 1 (left) and 2 (right) for expected returns (top) and volatility (bottom) identification constraints. In each block, gray shades represent the sector membership of the assets.

Figure 3: The posterior co-clustering matrix in regime 1 (left) and 2 (right) for expected returns (top) and volatility (bottom) identification constraints. In each block, gray shades represent the sector membership of the assets.

Figure 4: Price-to-Earning for the assets in clusters of regime 1 (left) and of regime 2 (right), constraint on expected returns (top panel). Logarithm of implied volatility for the assets in clusters of regime 1 (left) and of regime 2 (right), constraint on volatility (bottom panel).

Figure 4: Price-to-Earning for the assets in clusters of regime 1 (left) and of regime 2 (right), constraint on expected returns (top panel). Logarithm of implied volatility for the assets in clusters of regime 1 (left) and of regime 2 (right), constraint on volatility (bottom panel).

Table 1: Out-of-sample evaluation. RMSE and CRPS.

Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download PDF (2.6 MB)

Supplemental Material

Download Zip (116.8 KB)