ABSTRACT
This article begins with a reflection on the tensions that have existed at the intersection of attachment theory, psychoanalysis, and the use of empirical research methods. This discourse is described as having evolved considerably, involving some elements of intellectual détente and other elements of entrenchment (on both sides). It is suggested that future debate may revolve around the idea that many forms of psychopathology may be understood as fundamentally social in nature. Recognizing the salience of the communication of social knowledge—transmitted via epistemic trust—may be key to reconceptualizing both the origins of psychological disorder, and the processes that underlie effective treatments.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Peter Fonagy
Peter Fonagy, Ph.D., FBA, FMedSci, FAcSS, is Professor of Contemporary Psychoanalysis and Developmental Science and Head of the Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology at University College London; Chief Executive of the Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, London; Consultant to the Child and Family Program at the Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences at Baylor College of Medicine; and holds visiting professorships at Yale and Cambridge Universities.
Chloe Campbell
Chloe Campbell, Ph.D., is a Research Fellow at the Psychoanalysis Unit, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London.