ABSTRACT
Daniel Stern’s novel concept of vitality forms suggested to me questions about their evolution and roles in development that can lead to a deeper understanding of their origins and basic nature. For this article, I wrote down some of my thoughts and associations to such questions and hope these may contribute to others looking for a deeper understanding of Dan’s novel concept and even to new perspectives on clinical practice.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Myron A. Hofer
Myron A. Hofer, M.D., is Sackler Institute Professor Emeritus in the Department of Psychiatry at Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons. Research focuses on the biological behavioral, and psychological processes underlying attachment, separation and their long-term developmental effects.