ABSTRACT
Freud’s understanding of science allowed no origin for commitment to ethical values except via the superego. Recently, some psychoanalysts have found a more persuasive source in the thought of Emmanuel Levinas. In this paper, using in particular Viviane Chetrit-Vatine’s notion of “matricial space,” I attempt to look further at the implications of Levinas’s idea of “transcendence,” not as something special but as the ordinary horizon of seriously-held ethical values. To work as such, it must involve an affective dimension. Referencing Derrida’s Adieu for Levinas, I discuss this in terms of different meanings of the word “love,” in particular a certain sort of love for the unique “being” of the other, rather than for his or her “doing.”
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
David M. Black
David M. Black, M.A., F.Inst.Psychoanal, is a poet and a Fellow of the British Psychoanalytic Society. He edited Psychoanalysis and Religion in the 21st Century (Routledge New Library of Psychoanalysis, 2006) and authored Why Things Matter: The Place of Values in Science, Psychoanalysis and Religion (Routledge, 2011). His translation and commentary on Dante’s Purgatorio (NYRB Classics) appeared in 2021.