113
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Analytical and Clinical Validation of a Target-Enhanced Whole Genome Sequencing-Based Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Test

, , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 390-399 | Received 05 Feb 2024, Accepted 03 May 2024, Published online: 21 May 2024

Figures & data

Table 1. Overall performance of target enhanced -whole genome sequencing (TE-WGS).

Figure 1. Correlation of expected and observed variant allele fractions in the reference material. Observed variant allele fraction single nucleotide variants (A) and insertion and deletion variants (B) by TE-WGS were concordant with the expected variant allele fractions provided by the reference material manufacturer.

Figure 1. Correlation of expected and observed variant allele fractions in the reference material. Observed variant allele fraction single nucleotide variants (A) and insertion and deletion variants (B) by TE-WGS were concordant with the expected variant allele fractions provided by the reference material manufacturer.

Figure 2. (A) KRAS G12V reference standard serial dilution to assess the limit of detection (LOD). The minimum LOD for SNVs has been established at a VAF of 5%. (B) Violin plot depicting depth distribution across all targets in four analytical validation (AV) samples. Notably, the KRAS locus exhibits lower coverage (red dot), suggesting higher depth and potentially lower LOD (enhanced sensitivity) for most other targets. Black dots represent mean values, while horizontal lines indicate medians.

Figure 2. (A) KRAS G12V reference standard serial dilution to assess the limit of detection (LOD). The minimum LOD for SNVs has been established at a VAF of 5%. (B) Violin plot depicting depth distribution across all targets in four analytical validation (AV) samples. Notably, the KRAS locus exhibits lower coverage (red dot), suggesting higher depth and potentially lower LOD (enhanced sensitivity) for most other targets. Black dots represent mean values, while horizontal lines indicate medians.

Table 2. Tumor types of the samples for clinical validation.

Figure 3. Comparative Analysis of Copy Number and Variant Allele Frequency (VAF) in Tumor Samples. (A) Demonstrates a tumor characterized by widespread chromosomal arm-level and segmental copy number alterations, indicative of significant loss-of- heterozygosity and allelic imbalance. (B) Illustrates a sample with a low tumor cell fraction, revealing minimal copy number changes and allelic imbalance.

Figure 3. Comparative Analysis of Copy Number and Variant Allele Frequency (VAF) in Tumor Samples. (A) Demonstrates a tumor characterized by widespread chromosomal arm-level and segmental copy number alterations, indicative of significant loss-of- heterozygosity and allelic imbalance. (B) Illustrates a sample with a low tumor cell fraction, revealing minimal copy number changes and allelic imbalance.
Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download PDF (5.3 MB)

Data availability statement

The patients participating in this study did not consent to the public release of sequencing data. The TE-WGS pipeline and associated algorithms are proprietary to Inocras Inc.