Figures & data
FIGURE 1. Conceptual model of social robot acceptance including the hypotheses.
FIGURE 2. Characteristics of the Participants (n = 1,162) versus the Dutch Population.
FIGURE 3. Model Fit Indices of the Exploratory Factor Analysis.
FIGURE 4. Final Factor Solution.
FIGURE 4 (continued).
FIGURE 5. From left to right: The exploratory factor analysis model, the intermediate model, and the comparative factor analysis model.
FIGURE 6. Model Fit Indices of Robustness Testing.
FIGURE 7. Model Fit Indices of the First-Order Confirmatory Factor Analysis.
FIGURE 8. Correlations Between the First Order Factors.
FIGURE 9. Model Fit Indices of the Second-Order Factors Structures Separately.
FIGURE 10. Model Fit Indices of the Second-Order Factor Model.
FIGURE 11. Correlations Between the Second-Order Factors.
FIGURE 12. Model Fit Indices of the Structural Model.
FIGURE 13. Utilitarian Attitudes Affect Use Intention.
FIGURE 14. Hedonic Attitudes Affect Use Intention.
FIGURE 15. Utilitarian Attitudes Affect Utilitarian Attitudes.
FIGURE 16. Personal Norms Affect Use Intention.
FIGURE 17. Social Norms Affect Use Intention.
FIGURE 18. Personal Norms Affect Utilitarian Attitudes.
FIGURE 19. Personal Norms Affect Hedonic Attitudes.
FIGURE 20. Social Norms Affect Utilitarian Attitudes.
FIGURE 21. Social Norms Affect Hedonic Attitudes.
FIGURE 22. Social Norms Affect Personal Norms.
FIGURE 23. Control Beliefs Affect Use Intention.
FIGURE 24. Control Beliefs Affect Utilitarian Attitudes.
FIGURE 25. Control Beliefs Affect Hedonic Attitudes.
FIGURE 26. Social Norms Affect Control Beliefs.
FIGURE 27. Overview of the tested hypotheses of the social robot acceptance model.
