Unrelated parallel machine scheduling with job splitting

Abstract

Scheduling jobs on unrelated parallel machines is an activity that is very much a part of industrial scheduling. We report a methodology for minimizing the total weighted tardiness of all jobs intended to be processed on unrelated parallel machines in the presence of dynamic job releases and dynamic machine availability. More importantly, the mixed (binary) integer linear programming model formulated for the problem incorporates a couple of “hard” operational constraints to ensure that just-in-time manufacturing practices are followed by controlling the work-in-process and/or finished goods inventories generated by split jobs mandated by a tight due date, a high priority, and/or a high workload. Four different methods based on simple and composite dispatching rules are used to identify an initial solution, which is then used by the tabu-search-based heuristic solution algorithm to ultimately find the best solution. Incorporating the various tabu search features led to the development of six different heuristics that were tested on eight small problem instances to compare the quality of their solutions to the optimal solutions. The results show that the proposed heuristics are capable of obtaining solutions of good quality in a remarkably short computation time with the best performer among them recording a percentage deviation of only 1.18%. A factorial experiment based on a split-plot design is performed to test the performance of the heuristics on problem structures, ranging from nine jobs and three machines to 60 jobs and 15 machines. The results show that the newly developed composite dispatching heuristic, referred to as the modified apparent tardiness cost, is capable of obtaining initial solutions that significantly accelerate the tabu-search-based heuristics to attain the best solution. The use of a long-term memory function is proven to be advantageous in solving all problem structures. In addition, the variable tabu list size is preferred for solving the small problem structure, while the fixed tabu list size is preferred as the problem size grows from small to medium and then large.

Acknowledgements

We thank Professor Marc Posner, the Department Editor, an anonymous Associate Editor, and two anonymous referees for their valuable comments.