1,245
Views
45
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

“That’s Not Who I Am:” How Offenders Commit Violent Acts and Reject Authentically Violent Selves

Pages 492-516 | Published online: 18 Sep 2009
 

Abstract

Participation in contemporary street cultures often exposes individuals to a world characterized by violence. The participants in this study admitted to frequent experience with violence and regular use of it. Many viewed violence as an appropriate response to some situations, though they often worked to avoid negative connotations of such behavior, especially ascriptions of an “authentically” violent self. Using an interactionist framework, we explore the processes by which offenders who engage in violent crimes resist being labeled as authentically violent. Drawing from data from semi‐structured interviews with 30 offenders who engaged in carjackings, we analyze contrastive statements they employed to resist a violent self‐concept and label. Offenders differentiated their own violent behaviors, as situational and excusable, from behaviors that characterize authentically violent others. Understanding these processes sheds light on criminal identities and gives insights into attempts to change offender behavior by altering self‐conceptions.

Notes

1. Asking participants about how they see themselves and how others see them is a common interview technique in research using an interactionist and/or identity construction frameworks (e.g., Athens, Citation1997; Presser, Citation2008). We, like others, have found that the direct questions are useful in providing a starting point for participants to elaborate on their thoughts and perceptions. It is the explanation of their responses that provides valuable identity‐related data and not simply their initial yes or no response, which is of little analytical value. Even those who openly admit to being violent almost inevitably explain in what senses of the word they can be considered so.

2. This level of restraint does not appear to be granted when the motive is revenge or retaliation (Jacobs & Wright, Citation2006).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 386.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.