672
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Largemouth bass consumption demand on hatchery rainbow trout in two Washington lakes

&
Pages 200-211 | Published online: 23 Sep 2010

Figures & data

Figure 1 Map depicting the bathymetry (in meters), macrophyte distribution (shaded), sampling transects (numbered), and location of North and South Twin Lakes, Washington. North Twin Lake transects were utilized for largemouth bass population analysis in 2004 and all transects in both lakes were utilized in the 2005 diet analysis. Arrows represent approximate location of hatchery rainbow trout release sites.

Figure 1 Map depicting the bathymetry (in meters), macrophyte distribution (shaded), sampling transects (numbered), and location of North and South Twin Lakes, Washington. North Twin Lake transects were utilized for largemouth bass population analysis in 2004 and all transects in both lakes were utilized in the 2005 diet analysis. Arrows represent approximate location of hatchery rainbow trout release sites.

Table 1 Hatchery-raised rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) stocking rates and size ranges in North and South Twin Lakes for 2005.

Table 2 Energy density estimates taken from the literature of fish and invertebrates common to the Twin Lakes.

Table 3 Schnabel multiple-census population data for North Twin Lake, 2004. Numbers are largemouth bass recaptured (marked), unmarked (captured), and marked (at-large) during each sampling period.

Table 4 Population estimates (N) and confidence intervals (CI) for largemouth bass feeding groups (FG) sampled from North and South Twin Lakes, 2005. Percentages are proportions of the total population for each feeding group.

Table 5 Mean length (mm), range (in parenthesis), and sample size (n) of prey consumed by largemouth bass by feeding groups (FG) in North (NT) and South Twin (ST) lakes, 2005. Age estimates are for largemouth bass.

Figure 2 Relationship between prey lengths versus largemouth bass size classes in North Twin Lake (left) and South Twin Lake (right), 2005.

Figure 2 Relationship between prey lengths versus largemouth bass size classes in North Twin Lake (left) and South Twin Lake (right), 2005.

Figure 3 Daily consumption of crayfish, golden shiner, rainbow trout, and invertebrates by largemouth bass feeding groups (100–199, 200–299, ⩾ 300 mm) in North Twin Lake (left) and South Twin Lake (right) during 2005 as estimated by a bioenergetics model.

Figure 3 Daily consumption of crayfish, golden shiner, rainbow trout, and invertebrates by largemouth bass feeding groups (100–199, 200–299, ⩾ 300 mm) in North Twin Lake (left) and South Twin Lake (right) during 2005 as estimated by a bioenergetics model.

Figure 4 Total consumption in metric tonnes (± 95% confidence interval) from June 1 to October 18 of golden shiner, rainbow trout, crayfish, and invertebrates by largemouth bass feeding groups (100–199, 200–299, ⩾300 mm) in North and South Twin Lakes during 2005 as estimated by a bioenergetics model.

Figure 4 Total consumption in metric tonnes (± 95% confidence interval) from June 1 to October 18 of golden shiner, rainbow trout, crayfish, and invertebrates by largemouth bass feeding groups (100–199, 200–299, ⩾300 mm) in North and South Twin Lakes during 2005 as estimated by a bioenergetics model.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.