612
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

TDS and selenium projections for the Las Vegas Wash, post completion of the Systems Conveyance and Operations Program (SCOP)

&
Pages 249-257 | Published online: 19 Jan 2011

Figures & data

Figure 1 Aerial view of the Las Vegas Wash upstream of Lake Las Vegas, including locations of the 6 major tributaries and the 3 wastewater treatment plants.

Figure 1 Aerial view of the Las Vegas Wash upstream of Lake Las Vegas, including locations of the 6 major tributaries and the 3 wastewater treatment plants.

Figure 2 Aerial view of the Las Vegas Wash downstream of Lake Las Vegas as it flows into the Las Vegas Bay of Lake Mead.

Figure 2 Aerial view of the Las Vegas Wash downstream of Lake Las Vegas as it flows into the Las Vegas Bay of Lake Mead.

Figure 3 Path of the SCOP pipeline from the 3 treatment plants into the Boulder Basin of Lake Mead.

Figure 3 Path of the SCOP pipeline from the 3 treatment plants into the Boulder Basin of Lake Mead.

Table 1 Selenuim (Se), total dissolved solids (TDS) and flow rates for the 6 tributaries and for Wash site LW 0.8.

Figure 4 Total yearly Se loading from 6 tributaries to the Las Vegas Wash = 265 kg/yr.

Figure 4 Total yearly Se loading from 6 tributaries to the Las Vegas Wash = 265 kg/yr.

Figure 5 Average selenium concentrations (μg/L) in the Wash for 2007.

Figure 5 Average selenium concentrations (μg/L) in the Wash for 2007.

Figure 6 Average total dissolved solids (TDS; mg/L) in the Wash for 2007.

Figure 6 Average total dissolved solids (TDS; mg/L) in the Wash for 2007.

Figure 7 Projected Se and TDS concentrations in the Wash.

Figure 7 Projected Se and TDS concentrations in the Wash.

Figure 8 Projected Se concentrations in the Wash with different flow rates from wastewater preatment Plants (without treatment options).

Figure 8 Projected Se concentrations in the Wash with different flow rates from wastewater preatment Plants (without treatment options).

Figure 9 Flow from the wastewater treatment plants vs. conductivity in the Wash. 1700 and 1900 uS/cm are assumed as average electrical conductivities from the wastewater treatment plants.

Figure 9 Flow from the wastewater treatment plants vs. conductivity in the Wash. 1700 and 1900 uS/cm are assumed as average electrical conductivities from the wastewater treatment plants.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.