2,433
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Emergency Medicine

An observational cohort study of the performance of the REDS score compared to the SIRS criteria, NEWS2, CURB65, SOFA, MEDS and PIRO scores to risk-stratify emergency department suspected sepsis

, , &
Pages 1863-1874 | Received 03 Jul 2021, Accepted 07 Oct 2021, Published online: 22 Oct 2021

Figures & data

Figure 1. Patient flow diagram.

Figure 1. Patient flow diagram.

Table 1. The baseline characteristics of the study population.

Figure 2. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves for the REDS and comparator scores, for in-hospital mortality. REDS: risk-stratification of emergency department suspected sepsis; SIRS systemic inflammatory response syndrome; NEWS2: national early warning score 2; SOFA: sequential organ failure assessment; MEDS: mortality in emergency department sepsis; PIRO: patient infection response organ; CURB65: confusion urea respiratory rate blood pressure 65 (years); AUROC: area under receiver operator characteristic curve for the REDS score 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72–0.75); SIRS criteria 0.51 (95% CI 0.49–0.53); NEWS2 0.69 (95% CI 0.67–0.70), CURB65 0.71 (95% CI 0.69–0.72); SOFA score 0.74 (95% CI 0.72–0.76), MEDS score 0.75 (95% CI 0.73–0.75); PIRO 0.74 (95% CI 0.72–0.75).

Figure 2. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves for the REDS and comparator scores, for in-hospital mortality. REDS: risk-stratification of emergency department suspected sepsis; SIRS systemic inflammatory response syndrome; NEWS2: national early warning score 2; SOFA: sequential organ failure assessment; MEDS: mortality in emergency department sepsis; PIRO: patient infection response organ; CURB65: confusion urea respiratory rate blood pressure 65 (years); AUROC: area under receiver operator characteristic curve for the REDS score 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72–0.75); SIRS criteria 0.51 (95% CI 0.49–0.53); NEWS2 0.69 (95% CI 0.67–0.70), CURB65 0.71 (95% CI 0.69–0.72); SOFA score 0.74 (95% CI 0.72–0.76), MEDS score 0.75 (95% CI 0.73–0.75); PIRO 0.74 (95% CI 0.72–0.75).

Table 2. The AUROC curves, the cut-off points and the test characteristics of the REDS and comparator scores.

Table 3. The AUROC curves, the cut-off points and the test characteristics of the REDS and comparator scores after exclusion of patients with missing variables.

Figure 3. The percentage distribution of the REDS score through the study population and the percentage distribution of the REDS score through the deceased population. REDS score: risk-stratification of emergency department suspected sepsis score. Percentages have been rounded to the closest 1%.

Figure 3. The percentage distribution of the REDS score through the study population and the percentage distribution of the REDS score through the deceased population. REDS score: risk-stratification of emergency department suspected sepsis score. Percentages have been rounded to the closest 1%.

Data availability statement

All data used is included in the manuscript.