1,217
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Oncology

The prognostic significance of skin involvement in breast cancer patients with chest wall recurrence

, , , , , & show all
Article: 2232299 | Received 19 Aug 2021, Accepted 28 Jun 2023, Published online: 11 Jul 2023

Figures & data

Figure 1. A Flow chart outlining patients’ selection.

Figure 1. A Flow chart outlining patients’ selection.

Table 1. Clinical-pathological characteristics of 476 patients with CWR.

Figure 2. Representative images of non-skin involvement, tumours involving the dermis and tumours involving the epidermis. Representative images of non-skin involvement (A, 100× magnification; B, 400× magnification). Representative images of tumours involving the dermis (C, 100× magnification; D, 400× magnification). Representative images of tumours involving the epidermis (E, 100× magnification; F, 400× magnification).

Figure 2. Representative images of non-skin involvement, tumours involving the dermis and tumours involving the epidermis. Representative images of non-skin involvement (A, 100× magnification; B, 400× magnification). Representative images of tumours involving the dermis (C, 100× magnification; D, 400× magnification). Representative images of tumours involving the epidermis (E, 100× magnification; F, 400× magnification).

Table 2. Pathological characteristics of primary tumour in 345 patients with/without skin involvement.

Table 3. Clinical-pathological characteristics of chest wall lesions in 345 patients with/without skin involvement.

Figure 3. Kaplan–Meier curve for DFS and OS of 200 patients treated with radical resection stratified by skin involvement. (A) Kaplan–Meier curve for DFS stratified by skin involvement in 200 patients treated with radical resection. (B) Kaplan–Meier curve for OS stratified by skin involvement in these patients.

Figure 3. Kaplan–Meier curve for DFS and OS of 200 patients treated with radical resection stratified by skin involvement. (A) Kaplan–Meier curve for DFS stratified by skin involvement in 200 patients treated with radical resection. (B) Kaplan–Meier curve for OS stratified by skin involvement in these patients.

Figure 4. Kaplan–Meier curve for PFS and OS of 145 patients with locally unresectable CWR stratified by skin involvement. (A) Kaplan–Meier curve for PFS stratified by skin involvement in 145 patients with locally unresectable CWR. (B) Kaplan–Meier curve for OS stratified by skin involvement in these patients.

Figure 4. Kaplan–Meier curve for PFS and OS of 145 patients with locally unresectable CWR stratified by skin involvement. (A) Kaplan–Meier curve for PFS stratified by skin involvement in 145 patients with locally unresectable CWR. (B) Kaplan–Meier curve for OS stratified by skin involvement in these patients.

Table 4. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis of DFS in 200 patients treated with radical resection.

Figure 5. Kaplan–Meier curve for local and distant disease progression of 200 patients treated with radical resection stratified by skin involvement. (A) Kaplan–Meier curve for local disease progression stratified by skin involvement in 200 patients treated with radical resection. (B) Kaplan–Meier curve for distant disease progression stratified by skin involvement in these patients.

Figure 5. Kaplan–Meier curve for local and distant disease progression of 200 patients treated with radical resection stratified by skin involvement. (A) Kaplan–Meier curve for local disease progression stratified by skin involvement in 200 patients treated with radical resection. (B) Kaplan–Meier curve for distant disease progression stratified by skin involvement in these patients.

Figure 6. Kaplan–Meier curve for local and distant disease progression of 145 patients with locally unresectable CWR stratified by skin involvement. (A) Kaplan–Meier curve for local disease progression stratified by skin involvement in 145 patients with locally unresectable CWR. (B) Kaplan–Meier curve for distant disease progression stratified by skin involvement in these patients.

Figure 6. Kaplan–Meier curve for local and distant disease progression of 145 patients with locally unresectable CWR stratified by skin involvement. (A) Kaplan–Meier curve for local disease progression stratified by skin involvement in 145 patients with locally unresectable CWR. (B) Kaplan–Meier curve for distant disease progression stratified by skin involvement in these patients.

Table 5. Comparison of pathological characteristics of primary tumour in patients with/without persistent chest wall progression.

Table 6. Comparison of clinical-pathological characteristics of chest wall lesions in patients with/without persistent chest wall progression.

Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download MS Word (13.2 KB)

Data availability statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.