Figures & data
Table 1. Baseline clinical characteristics.
Figure 1. Clinical outcomes and efficacy analysis in EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC with or without bevacizumab. Kaplan–Meier curves for PFS (A) and OS (B); best response (C), ORR (D) and DCR (E).
![Figure 1. Clinical outcomes and efficacy analysis in EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC with or without bevacizumab. Kaplan–Meier curves for PFS (A) and OS (B); best response (C), ORR (D) and DCR (E).](/cms/asset/0c80cf05-751a-4d51-94a8-e6693c91abd9/iann_a_2257227_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier curves of PFS (A) and OS (B) in EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC receiving EGFR-TKI monotherapy according to ECOG PS. Kaplan–Meier curves of PFS (C) and OS (D) in EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC receiving EGFR-TKIs monotherapy according to pre-treatment LAR.
![Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier curves of PFS (A) and OS (B) in EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC receiving EGFR-TKI monotherapy according to ECOG PS. Kaplan–Meier curves of PFS (C) and OS (D) in EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC receiving EGFR-TKIs monotherapy according to pre-treatment LAR.](/cms/asset/272f4561-88ae-4475-af0c-f012f39b845e/iann_a_2257227_f0002_c.jpg)
Table 2. Univariate and Multivariate Cox analysis for PFS in advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC receiving EGFR-TKI monotherapy.
Table 3. Univariate and multivariate analysis for OS in advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC receiving EGFR-TKI monotherapy.
Figure 3. Time-dependent ROC curves of LAPS score for predicting 1-, 2-, 3-years OS (A) and P1-, 2-, 3-years PFS (B).
![Figure 3. Time-dependent ROC curves of LAPS score for predicting 1-, 2-, 3-years OS (A) and P1-, 2-, 3-years PFS (B).](/cms/asset/415a945d-747c-471d-8e7c-4752e7238f71/iann_a_2257227_f0003_c.jpg)
Figure 4. Clinical outcomes and efficacy analysis for EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC receiving EGFR-TKI monotherapy in different risk groups. Kaplan–Meier curves for PFS (A) and OS (B); best response (C), ORR (D) and DCR (E).
![Figure 4. Clinical outcomes and efficacy analysis for EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC receiving EGFR-TKI monotherapy in different risk groups. Kaplan–Meier curves for PFS (A) and OS (B); best response (C), ORR (D) and DCR (E).](/cms/asset/9f02b077-b8e5-4228-925a-6139096afc31/iann_a_2257227_f0004_c.jpg)
Table 4. Efficacy response of different treatment modalities according to LAPS score.
Data availability statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.