Figures & data
Figure 1. Ultrasound imaging for thickness (A) and stiffness (B) measurements of the masseter muscle. White dashed line, maximal muscle thickness.
![Figure 1. Ultrasound imaging for thickness (A) and stiffness (B) measurements of the masseter muscle. White dashed line, maximal muscle thickness.](/cms/asset/cda8ed91-e3d8-4f17-8ac8-ee8eb630a398/iann_a_2261116_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2. Ultrasound imaging for thickness (A) and stiffness (B) measurements of the temporalis muscle. White dashed line, maximal muscle thickness.
![Figure 2. Ultrasound imaging for thickness (A) and stiffness (B) measurements of the temporalis muscle. White dashed line, maximal muscle thickness.](/cms/asset/b9d013e3-d231-460f-8087-a117ca8bb07e/iann_a_2261116_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 3. Ultrasound imaging for thickness (A) and stiffness (B) measurements of the temporalis muscle. White dashed line, maximal muscle thickness; LPM, lateral pterygoid muscle; CORP, coronoid process of the mandible.
![Figure 3. Ultrasound imaging for thickness (A) and stiffness (B) measurements of the temporalis muscle. White dashed line, maximal muscle thickness; LPM, lateral pterygoid muscle; CORP, coronoid process of the mandible.](/cms/asset/4e3439bc-5a44-4e99-9867-1e339a197457/iann_a_2261116_f0003_c.jpg)
Table 1. Characteristics of the enrolled participants.
Table 2. Muscle thickness/stiffness in patients with unilateral orofacial pain.
Table 3. Comparative muscle thickness/stiffness values of the subjects.
Table 4. Associations between patient demographics and masticatory muscle thickness/stiffness values.
Data availability statement
The datasets generated or analyzed during the study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.